Description of impact
Interview and coverage of Vanhuysse et al (2023) in long article in the NYT written by Amanda Taub, 'The Feminist Case for Spending Billions to Boost the Birthrate'| Impact date | 20. Jun 2025 |
|---|---|
| Category of impact | Social impact, Cultural impact |
| Impact level | Macro-level |
Documents & Links
Related content
-
Impacts
-
citation in special Finnish Government Report commissioned by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
Impact: Public policy impact
-
Highlighted citation in Norwegian Government's Birth Commission final report on birth rates
Impact: Public policy impact
-
Consultation to the Finnish government appointed Special Task Force on Population Policy, Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Helsinki
Impact: Public policy impact, Social impact
-
Plenary keynote at WHO conference 'Ageing is living: working for a lifetime of health and well-being'
Impact: Public policy impact, Social impact
-
Citation in interim report by the Norwegian government's Birth Rate Committee,commissioned by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
Impact: Public policy impact, Social impact
-
Consultation to the Norwegian government’s appointed special Expert Commission on Birth Rates
Impact: Public policy impact
-
Research output
-
The New Nordic Paradox: How Family-friendly Welfare States Burden Parents the Most
Research output: Other contribution › Net publication - Internet publication › Communication
-
Debunking the ‘Stork Theory’: Why Do Low-Fertility Societies Tax Their Own Reproduction?
Research output: Other contribution › Net publication - Internet publication › Communication
-
Taxing Reproduction: The Full Transfer Cost of Rearing Children in Europe
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
Press/Media