Description
Until surprisingly recently many researchers claimed that senescence, defined as a decline in age-specific survival or fertility with age, would be undetectable in wild animal populations. This is now known to be untrue and numerous studies have demonstrated that senescence is a common feature of mammal and bird life histories. But what about other taxa? Canonical theories on the evolution of senescence imply that senescence is inevitable: all species must senesce. I present results showing that although senescence is common in wild vertebrates, it is not ubiquitous across the tree of life: negligible and negative senescence are commonplace. I consider the factors that may drive these differing senescence characteristics, then highlight the consequences that this variation may have for analyses of population dynamics.Oral contribution
Period | 12. Dec 2014 |
---|---|
Event title | Joint 2014 Annual Meeting British Ecological Society and Société Française d' Ecologie |
Event type | Conference |
Location | Lille, FranceShow on map |
Documents & Links
Related content
-
Research output
-
Diversity of ageing across the tree of life
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
The COMPADRE Plant Matrix Database: an Open Online Repository for Plant Demography
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
The Pace and Shape of Senescence in Angiosperms
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
-
Why do humans deteriorate with age? It’s a biological puzzle
Research output: Other contribution › Net publication - Internet publication › Communication
-
Datasets