Wild West eHealth: Time to hold our horses?

Jeroen Ruwaard, Robin Niels Kok

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

42 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

In reviews of the eMental health field, the Netherlands are often hailed as a forerunner nation. All that glitters, however, may not be gold. Dutch eMental health upscaling efforts are currently characterized by one of the most dubious mottos of the old Wild West, ‘Shoot first, ask questions later’. Pressed into action by financial incentives from health insurance companies, mental health organisations hastily implement untested e-health interventions on an increasing scale. On introduction, the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these interventions is simply asserted or assumed. Efficacy trials start after implementation, if ever at all. Arguments do exist for this disconcerting twist in the preferred order of things, but we argue that these do not hold up to closer scrutiny. Large-scale dissemination of unvalidated e-health may kick-start a quality-sacrificing, cost-driven downward spiral in mental health care. It is time to hold our horses.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe European Health Psychologist
Vol/bind17
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)45-49
ISSN2225-6962
StatusUdgivet - 2015
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

Horse
Health
Efficacy
Mental Health
E-health
Forerunner
Dissemination
The Netherlands
Healthcare
Spiral
Health Insurance
Costs
Scrutiny
Motto
Cost-effectiveness
Order of Things
Incentives

Citer dette

@article{10f629eee32f432b86a3be6dce78c7a8,
title = "Wild West eHealth: Time to hold our horses?",
abstract = "In reviews of the eMental health field, the Netherlands are often hailed as a forerunner nation. All that glitters, however, may not be gold. Dutch eMental health upscaling efforts are currently characterized by one of the most dubious mottos of the old Wild West, ‘Shoot first, ask questions later’. Pressed into action by financial incentives from health insurance companies, mental health organisations hastily implement untested e-health interventions on an increasing scale. On introduction, the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these interventions is simply asserted or assumed. Efficacy trials start after implementation, if ever at all. Arguments do exist for this disconcerting twist in the preferred order of things, but we argue that these do not hold up to closer scrutiny. Large-scale dissemination of unvalidated e-health may kick-start a quality-sacrificing, cost-driven downward spiral in mental health care. It is time to hold our horses.",
author = "Jeroen Ruwaard and Kok, {Robin Niels}",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "45--49",
journal = "The European Health Psychologist",
issn = "2225-6962",
number = "1",

}

Wild West eHealth : Time to hold our horses? / Ruwaard, Jeroen; Kok, Robin Niels.

I: The European Health Psychologist, Bind 17, Nr. 1, 2015, s. 45-49.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelFormidling

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wild West eHealth

T2 - Time to hold our horses?

AU - Ruwaard, Jeroen

AU - Kok, Robin Niels

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In reviews of the eMental health field, the Netherlands are often hailed as a forerunner nation. All that glitters, however, may not be gold. Dutch eMental health upscaling efforts are currently characterized by one of the most dubious mottos of the old Wild West, ‘Shoot first, ask questions later’. Pressed into action by financial incentives from health insurance companies, mental health organisations hastily implement untested e-health interventions on an increasing scale. On introduction, the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these interventions is simply asserted or assumed. Efficacy trials start after implementation, if ever at all. Arguments do exist for this disconcerting twist in the preferred order of things, but we argue that these do not hold up to closer scrutiny. Large-scale dissemination of unvalidated e-health may kick-start a quality-sacrificing, cost-driven downward spiral in mental health care. It is time to hold our horses.

AB - In reviews of the eMental health field, the Netherlands are often hailed as a forerunner nation. All that glitters, however, may not be gold. Dutch eMental health upscaling efforts are currently characterized by one of the most dubious mottos of the old Wild West, ‘Shoot first, ask questions later’. Pressed into action by financial incentives from health insurance companies, mental health organisations hastily implement untested e-health interventions on an increasing scale. On introduction, the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these interventions is simply asserted or assumed. Efficacy trials start after implementation, if ever at all. Arguments do exist for this disconcerting twist in the preferred order of things, but we argue that these do not hold up to closer scrutiny. Large-scale dissemination of unvalidated e-health may kick-start a quality-sacrificing, cost-driven downward spiral in mental health care. It is time to hold our horses.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 45

EP - 49

JO - The European Health Psychologist

JF - The European Health Psychologist

SN - 2225-6962

IS - 1

ER -