Aktiviteter pr. år
indispensable, its fairness and reliability is often questioned. This article suggests
that such worries can to a large extent be met by adopting the practice that
reviews as well as earlier versions of papers are made publicly available when the
final version of a paper is published. This suggestion combines the advantages of
transparency with the merits of anonymity of reviewers. While there are obstacles
to this suggestion, the article argues that it would be worthwhile to implement it
because it can help map patterns of conduct and secure confidence in the fairness
and reliability of review procedures and journal editing within philosophy.
- Peer Review
FingeraftrykDyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Why not Open the Black Box of Journal Editing in Philosophy? Make Peer Reviews of Published Papers Available'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.
- 1 Andet
Søren Harnow Klausen (Deltager), Caroline Schaffalitzky de Muckadell (Deltager), Mikkel Gerken (Deltager), Nikolaj Nottelmann (Deltager), Anne-Marie Søndergaard Christensen (Deltager), Peter Wolsing (Deltager), Jesper Lundsfryd Rasmussen (Deltager), Esben Nedenskov Petersen (Deltager), Søren Mads Mau (Deltager), Alessandra Cenci (Deltager) & Lilli Zeuner (Deltager)1. jan. 2017 → …
Aktivitet: Andre aktiviteter › Andet