Whose Rights? The Danish Debate on Ritual Infant Male Circumcision as a Human Rights Issue

Publikation: Kapitel i bog/rapport/konference-proceedingKapitel i bogForskningpeer review

Abstrakt

The debate over ritual infant male circumcision has increasingly been thematized as a Human Rights issue. But the claims on such rights seem highly conflicting. In particular, the rights of the child seems to conflict with the freedom of religion of parents, the rights of religious and ethnic minorities, and the rights of family and privacy. This disagreement is also present among scholars of religion. A reading of public statements by scholars of religion in the ongoing Danish (and Norwegian) debate reveals the lack of consensus of the study of religion when it comes to matters that are of great concern both for religious minorities and for individual citizens. This chapter examines the Law and Human Rights documents behind these conflicting claims and discusses the role of the scholar of religion in the debate.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelContemporary Views on Comparative Religion : In Celebration of Tim Jensen's 65th Birthday
RedaktørerPeter Antes, Armin W. Geertz, Mikael Rothstein
Udgivelses stedSheffield
ForlagEquinox Publishing
Publikationsdato2016
Sider311-324
Kapitel24
ISBN (Trykt)9781781791394
ISBN (Elektronisk)9781781792896
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Emneord

  • Drengeomskæring
  • Menneskerettigheder
  • Børnekonventionen
  • Religion
  • Danmark
  • Seksuelle rettigheder
  • Religionsfrihed

Fingeraftryk Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Whose Rights? The Danish Debate on Ritual Infant Male Circumcision as a Human Rights Issue'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater