Variation in expert source selection according to different objectivity standards

Bidragets oversatte titel: Variation i kildevalg som følge af forskellige objektivitetsstandarder

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Several scholars have tried to clarify how journalists handle and implement the abstract objectivity norm in daily practice. Less research attention has been paid to how common abstract professional norms and values, in casu the objectivity norm, may systematically vary when interpreted and implemented in daily journalistic practice. Allgaier’s study “Who is having a voice?” is a most welcome contribution to the, so far, limited literature on variation in the interpretation and implementation of journalistic norms among journalists. Not only does it demonstrate how the interpretation of journalistic norms may vary among journalists, but it goes one step further and demonstrates how variation in the implementation of such norms may affect journalistic products
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCultural Studies of Science Education
Vol/bind6
Sider (fra-til)574-478
Antal sider5
ISSN1871-1502
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Citer dette

@article{559bb06c6e6a4b4896980db1a1572e72,
title = "Variation in expert source selection according to different objectivity standards",
abstract = "Several scholars have tried to clarify how journalists handle and implement the abstract objectivity norm in daily practice. Less research attention has been paid to how common abstract professional norms and values, in casu the objectivity norm, may systematically vary when interpreted and implemented in daily journalistic practice. Allgaier’s study “Who is having a voice?” is a most welcome contribution to the, so far, limited literature on variation in the interpretation and implementation of journalistic norms among journalists. Not only does it demonstrate how the interpretation of journalistic norms may vary among journalists, but it goes one step further and demonstrates how variation in the implementation of such norms may affect journalistic products",
author = "Erik Alb{\ae}k",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "574--478",
journal = "C S S E",
issn = "1871-1502",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Variation in expert source selection according to different objectivity standards. / Albæk, Erik.

I: Cultural Studies of Science Education, Bind 6, 2011, s. 574-478.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variation in expert source selection according to different objectivity standards

AU - Albæk, Erik

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Several scholars have tried to clarify how journalists handle and implement the abstract objectivity norm in daily practice. Less research attention has been paid to how common abstract professional norms and values, in casu the objectivity norm, may systematically vary when interpreted and implemented in daily journalistic practice. Allgaier’s study “Who is having a voice?” is a most welcome contribution to the, so far, limited literature on variation in the interpretation and implementation of journalistic norms among journalists. Not only does it demonstrate how the interpretation of journalistic norms may vary among journalists, but it goes one step further and demonstrates how variation in the implementation of such norms may affect journalistic products

AB - Several scholars have tried to clarify how journalists handle and implement the abstract objectivity norm in daily practice. Less research attention has been paid to how common abstract professional norms and values, in casu the objectivity norm, may systematically vary when interpreted and implemented in daily journalistic practice. Allgaier’s study “Who is having a voice?” is a most welcome contribution to the, so far, limited literature on variation in the interpretation and implementation of journalistic norms among journalists. Not only does it demonstrate how the interpretation of journalistic norms may vary among journalists, but it goes one step further and demonstrates how variation in the implementation of such norms may affect journalistic products

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 574

EP - 478

JO - C S S E

JF - C S S E

SN - 1871-1502

ER -