Validity - a matter of resonant experience

The case of being newcomer researching newcomer innovation of others

Line Revsbæk

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftPaperForskning

Resumé

This paper is about doing interview analysis drawing on researcher’s own lived experience concerning the question of inquiry. The paper exemplifies analyzing case study participants’ experience from the resonant experience of researcher’s own life evoked while listening to recorded interview material. The suggested method of ‘analyzing in the present’ is understood drawing on G. H. Mead’s Philosophy of the Present (1932) and is a method for producing empirical narratives inclusive of researcher’s reflexive voice. Situated breakdowns-in-understanding creates an abductive pattern of associations across researcher’s past experience from the case study and her own life. The autobiographic way of analyzing conventional interview material is exemplified with a case of a junior researcher researching newcomer innovation of others, drawing on her own experience of being newcomer in work community entry processes. The validity of doing interview analysis drawing on the resonant experience of researcher is argued from a pragmatist perspective.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato17 jun. 2015
Antal sider15
StatusUdgivet - 17 jun. 2015
Begivenhed7th International Process Symposium - Kos, Grækenland
Varighed: 24 jun. 201527 jun. 2015

Konference

Konference7th International Process Symposium
LandGrækenland
ByKos
Periode24/06/201527/06/2015

Fingeraftryk

innovation
experience
interview
present
narrative
community

Citer dette

Revsbæk, L. (2015). Validity - a matter of resonant experience: The case of being newcomer researching newcomer innovation of others. Afhandling præsenteret på 7th International Process Symposium, Kos, Grækenland.
Revsbæk, Line. / Validity - a matter of resonant experience : The case of being newcomer researching newcomer innovation of others. Afhandling præsenteret på 7th International Process Symposium, Kos, Grækenland.15 s.
@conference{8de59ae63edf44488ec7b342cb5ed8d9,
title = "Validity - a matter of resonant experience: The case of being newcomer researching newcomer innovation of others",
abstract = "This paper is about doing interview analysis drawing on researcher’s own lived experience concerning the question of inquiry. The paper exemplifies analyzing case study participants’ experience from the resonant experience of researcher’s own life evoked while listening to recorded interview material. The suggested method of ‘analyzing in the present’ is understood drawing on G. H. Mead’s Philosophy of the Present (1932) and is a method for producing empirical narratives inclusive of researcher’s reflexive voice. Situated breakdowns-in-understanding creates an abductive pattern of associations across researcher’s past experience from the case study and her own life. The autobiographic way of analyzing conventional interview material is exemplified with a case of a junior researcher researching newcomer innovation of others, drawing on her own experience of being newcomer in work community entry processes. The validity of doing interview analysis drawing on the resonant experience of researcher is argued from a pragmatist perspective.",
keywords = "data analysis, qualitative interviews, G. H. Mead, philosophy of the present, autobiography, resonance, abductive reasoning, breakdown-in-understanding",
author = "Line Revsb{\ae}k",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "17",
language = "English",
note = "7th International Process Symposium ; Conference date: 24-06-2015 Through 27-06-2015",

}

Revsbæk, L 2015, 'Validity - a matter of resonant experience: The case of being newcomer researching newcomer innovation of others' Paper fremlagt ved 7th International Process Symposium, Kos, Grækenland, 24/06/2015 - 27/06/2015, .

Validity - a matter of resonant experience : The case of being newcomer researching newcomer innovation of others. / Revsbæk, Line.

2015. Afhandling præsenteret på 7th International Process Symposium, Kos, Grækenland.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftPaperForskning

TY - CONF

T1 - Validity - a matter of resonant experience

T2 - The case of being newcomer researching newcomer innovation of others

AU - Revsbæk, Line

PY - 2015/6/17

Y1 - 2015/6/17

N2 - This paper is about doing interview analysis drawing on researcher’s own lived experience concerning the question of inquiry. The paper exemplifies analyzing case study participants’ experience from the resonant experience of researcher’s own life evoked while listening to recorded interview material. The suggested method of ‘analyzing in the present’ is understood drawing on G. H. Mead’s Philosophy of the Present (1932) and is a method for producing empirical narratives inclusive of researcher’s reflexive voice. Situated breakdowns-in-understanding creates an abductive pattern of associations across researcher’s past experience from the case study and her own life. The autobiographic way of analyzing conventional interview material is exemplified with a case of a junior researcher researching newcomer innovation of others, drawing on her own experience of being newcomer in work community entry processes. The validity of doing interview analysis drawing on the resonant experience of researcher is argued from a pragmatist perspective.

AB - This paper is about doing interview analysis drawing on researcher’s own lived experience concerning the question of inquiry. The paper exemplifies analyzing case study participants’ experience from the resonant experience of researcher’s own life evoked while listening to recorded interview material. The suggested method of ‘analyzing in the present’ is understood drawing on G. H. Mead’s Philosophy of the Present (1932) and is a method for producing empirical narratives inclusive of researcher’s reflexive voice. Situated breakdowns-in-understanding creates an abductive pattern of associations across researcher’s past experience from the case study and her own life. The autobiographic way of analyzing conventional interview material is exemplified with a case of a junior researcher researching newcomer innovation of others, drawing on her own experience of being newcomer in work community entry processes. The validity of doing interview analysis drawing on the resonant experience of researcher is argued from a pragmatist perspective.

KW - data analysis

KW - qualitative interviews

KW - G. H. Mead

KW - philosophy of the present

KW - autobiography

KW - resonance

KW - abductive reasoning

KW - breakdown-in-understanding

UR - http://www.process-symposium.com

M3 - Paper

ER -

Revsbæk L. Validity - a matter of resonant experience: The case of being newcomer researching newcomer innovation of others. 2015. Afhandling præsenteret på 7th International Process Symposium, Kos, Grækenland.