TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of a fully automatic three-dimensional assessment of orthognathic surgery
AU - Holte, Michael Boelstoft
AU - Pinholt, Else Marie
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - The aim of the present study was to propose and validate FAST3D: a fully automatic three-dimensional (3D) assessment of the surgical accuracy and the long-term skeletal stability of orthognathic surgery. To validate FAST3D, the agreement between FAST3D and a validated state-of-the-art semi-automatic method was calculated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) at a 95 % confidence interval. A one-sided hypothesis test was performed to evaluate whether the absolute discrepancy between the measurements produced by the two methods was statistically significantly below a clinically relevant error margin of 0.5 mm. Ten subjects (six male, four female; mean age 24.4 years), class II and III, who underwent a combined three-piece Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty, were included in the validation study. The agreement between the two methods was excellent for all measurements, ICC range (0.85–1.00), and fair for the rotational stability of the chin, ICC = 0.54. The absolute discrepancy for all measurements was statistically significantly lower than the clinical relevant error margin (p < 0.008). Within the limitations of the present validation study, FAST3D demonstrated to be reliable and may be adopted whenever appropriate in order to reduce the work load of the medical staff.
AB - The aim of the present study was to propose and validate FAST3D: a fully automatic three-dimensional (3D) assessment of the surgical accuracy and the long-term skeletal stability of orthognathic surgery. To validate FAST3D, the agreement between FAST3D and a validated state-of-the-art semi-automatic method was calculated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) at a 95 % confidence interval. A one-sided hypothesis test was performed to evaluate whether the absolute discrepancy between the measurements produced by the two methods was statistically significantly below a clinically relevant error margin of 0.5 mm. Ten subjects (six male, four female; mean age 24.4 years), class II and III, who underwent a combined three-piece Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty, were included in the validation study. The agreement between the two methods was excellent for all measurements, ICC range (0.85–1.00), and fair for the rotational stability of the chin, ICC = 0.54. The absolute discrepancy for all measurements was statistically significantly lower than the clinical relevant error margin (p < 0.008). Within the limitations of the present validation study, FAST3D demonstrated to be reliable and may be adopted whenever appropriate in order to reduce the work load of the medical staff.
KW - Computer-assisted surgery
KW - Cone-beam computed tomography
KW - Genioplasty
KW - Mandibular osteotomy
KW - Maxillary osteotomy
KW - Orthognathic surgery
KW - Three-dimensional imaging
KW - Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/methods
KW - Genioplasty/methods
KW - Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Orthognathic Surgery
KW - Young Adult
KW - Osteotomy, Le Fort/methods
KW - Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus/methods
KW - Maxilla/surgery
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Cephalometry/methods
KW - Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.01.009
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38369395
SN - 1010-5182
VL - 52
SP - 438
EP - 446
JO - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 4
ER -