[Triage in acute medical admission units.]

Mikkel Brabrand, Lars Folkestad, Peter Hallas

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many emergency departments use validated triage tools. It is currently undocumented if such a practice is common in Danish medical admission units (MAU). The current study was conducted in order to clarify this. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Questionnaire survey with data collected from the intern on call at the medical departments of all Danish hospitals listed on sundhed.dk. RESULTS: We received 87 answers from 60 individual MAUs covered by a total of 83 interns on call. The MAUs had a median of eight beds and 14 admissions a day. An intern was on call 24 hours a day at 95% of the MAUs. At 87% of the MAUs, a doctor was contacted by the admitting physician, while the contact was the responsibility of a nurse in 13% of MAUs. None of the contacted MAUs used a validated triage tool and 95% answered that they triaged on the basis of individual clinical assessment of patients. However, 22% answered that selected groups of patients were routinely assessed by a senior physician. CONCLUSION: None of the Danish MAUs uses a validated triage tool to prioritize acutely admitted medical patients.
Udgivelsesdato: 2010-May-31
OriginalsprogDansk
TidsskriftUgeskrift for Læger
Vol/bind172
Udgave nummer22
Sider (fra-til)1666-1668
Antal sider2
ISSN0041-5782
StatusUdgivet - 31. maj 2010

Citationsformater