TY - JOUR
T1 - Treatment and exercise strategies and their associations with pain and disability: a prospective cohort study of patients with long-lasting low back pain
AU - Schmidt, Anne Mette
AU - Jensen, Tue Secher
AU - Fenger-Grøn, Morten
AU - Hestbæk, Lise
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Objectives To describe self-reported treatment and exercise strategies among patients with long-lasting low back pain (LBP) 1 month after consultation at a specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic and evaluate their associations with changes in pain and disability 1 and 3 months after consultation. Design Prospective cohort study using questionnaire data before consultation (baseline) and 1 and 3 months after consultation. Setting Specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic, Denmark. Participants 1686 patients with long-lasting LBP completed the baseline questionnaire; 908 patients responded at 1 month, of them 623 responded at 3 month. Interventions Patients were categorised by treatment (physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, physiotherapy+chiropractic treatment and no recommended treatment) and exercise strategy (exercise continued, exercise ceased, exercise initiated and not exercising). Primary and secondary outcome measures Pain was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS: 0-10), and disability was assessed by the Oswestry disability index (ODI: 0-100). Results 1-month postconsultation, half of the patients received no recommended treatment; most others received physiotherapy (42%). Nearly half of the patients continued exercise, 28% continued to be inactive, and 22% initiated exercise. For the population as a whole, pain changed by -0.74 (95% CI -0.90; -0.58) and -1.02 (95% CI -1.22; -0.83) points on the NRS at 1- and 3-month follow-up, respectively, and disability by -2.65 (95% CI -3.51; -1.78) and -4.48 (95% CI -5.59; -3.38) points on the ODI. Differences between treatment strategies were small. However, the two groups not exercising improved less compared with those who continued exercise when adjusted for age, sex and baseline level (order of magnitude from 0.07 to 1.18 points on the NRS and from 4.01 to 9.08 points on the ODI). For pain, these group differences were statistically significant at 1 month (p<0.001 for the exercise ceased group and p=0.01 for those not exercising) but not at 3 months (p=0.87, respectively, p=0.21). For disability, the differences were statistically significant both at 1 month (p<0.001 for both groups) and 3 months (p=0.03 and <0.01). Conclusions Mean improvement was negligible, with no differences between treatment strategies. However, patients not exercising showed no or less improvement, highlighting the importance of exercise in managing long-lasting LBP.
AB - Objectives To describe self-reported treatment and exercise strategies among patients with long-lasting low back pain (LBP) 1 month after consultation at a specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic and evaluate their associations with changes in pain and disability 1 and 3 months after consultation. Design Prospective cohort study using questionnaire data before consultation (baseline) and 1 and 3 months after consultation. Setting Specialised hospital-based Medical Spine Clinic, Denmark. Participants 1686 patients with long-lasting LBP completed the baseline questionnaire; 908 patients responded at 1 month, of them 623 responded at 3 month. Interventions Patients were categorised by treatment (physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, physiotherapy+chiropractic treatment and no recommended treatment) and exercise strategy (exercise continued, exercise ceased, exercise initiated and not exercising). Primary and secondary outcome measures Pain was assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS: 0-10), and disability was assessed by the Oswestry disability index (ODI: 0-100). Results 1-month postconsultation, half of the patients received no recommended treatment; most others received physiotherapy (42%). Nearly half of the patients continued exercise, 28% continued to be inactive, and 22% initiated exercise. For the population as a whole, pain changed by -0.74 (95% CI -0.90; -0.58) and -1.02 (95% CI -1.22; -0.83) points on the NRS at 1- and 3-month follow-up, respectively, and disability by -2.65 (95% CI -3.51; -1.78) and -4.48 (95% CI -5.59; -3.38) points on the ODI. Differences between treatment strategies were small. However, the two groups not exercising improved less compared with those who continued exercise when adjusted for age, sex and baseline level (order of magnitude from 0.07 to 1.18 points on the NRS and from 4.01 to 9.08 points on the ODI). For pain, these group differences were statistically significant at 1 month (p<0.001 for the exercise ceased group and p=0.01 for those not exercising) but not at 3 months (p=0.87, respectively, p=0.21). For disability, the differences were statistically significant both at 1 month (p<0.001 for both groups) and 3 months (p=0.03 and <0.01). Conclusions Mean improvement was negligible, with no differences between treatment strategies. However, patients not exercising showed no or less improvement, highlighting the importance of exercise in managing long-lasting LBP.
KW - Humans
KW - Low Back Pain/therapy
KW - Male
KW - Female
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Exercise Therapy/methods
KW - Adult
KW - Denmark
KW - Disability Evaluation
KW - Pain Measurement
KW - Surveys and Questionnaires
KW - Aged
KW - Physical Therapy Modalities
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Manipulation, Chiropractic
KW - Self Report
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100554
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100554
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40592747
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 15
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 7
M1 - e100554
ER -