TY - GEN
T1 - Towards ’smoke-free school hours’ as part of routine practice
T2 - Examining implementation processes and outcomes related to the Smoke-Free Vocational Schools intervention
AU - Vang Hjort, Anneke
PY - 2023/2/21
Y1 - 2023/2/21
N2 - In Denmark, the smoking prevalence among students enrolled in vocational education- and training is high (29 % smoked daily In 2020; compared to 13 % in the
general population). The ‘smoke-free school hours’ policy stipulates that using
any tobacco products is prohibited during school time – inside and outside school
premises. The policy might be effective to reduce smoking among Danish vocational school students. Yet, the effectiveness depends on how well the policy is
implemented into routine practice. Knowledge on implementation is needed.
This PhD study was part of the Smoke-Free Vocational Schools intervention,
which aimed to support seven schools in implementing the smoke-free school
hours policy. Specifically, this PhD study provided knowledge on which and how
intervention activities and mechanisms leveraged the implementation of smokefree school hours – through four studies.
Study 1 identified barriers to and facilitators for organizational readiness to implement the smoke-free school hours policy, which was used to develop the SmokeFree Vocational Schools intervention. Study 2 depicted a programme theory of
how the intervention was expected to leverage policy implementation, which constituted a platform for testing activities and mechanisms. Study 3 assessed associations between the intervention activities and policy implementation outcomes.
As a prerequisite, we developed a set of implementation outcome measures for
the policy. Study 4 investigated the implementation mechanisms, i.e., the reasoning and behavior change, that produced implementation outcomes.
Four mechanisms were likely to leverage policy implementation: (1) a shared vision, (2) legitimacy beliefs regarding sanctioning and enforcement, (3) behavior
change to ensure consistent enforcement, and (4) formal and informal appraisal
of positive impact. Five intervention activities were beneficial implementation
strategies: (1) structural means to achieve a better social environment, (2) a joint
workshop for all staff and managers, (3) clear rules and responsibilities, (4) external support, and (5) delivering activities before the policy was put into force.
Future research should investigate intended and unintended individual-level outcomes associated with policy implementation, namely, cigarette use, smokeless
tobacco use, and stigmatization.
AB - In Denmark, the smoking prevalence among students enrolled in vocational education- and training is high (29 % smoked daily In 2020; compared to 13 % in the
general population). The ‘smoke-free school hours’ policy stipulates that using
any tobacco products is prohibited during school time – inside and outside school
premises. The policy might be effective to reduce smoking among Danish vocational school students. Yet, the effectiveness depends on how well the policy is
implemented into routine practice. Knowledge on implementation is needed.
This PhD study was part of the Smoke-Free Vocational Schools intervention,
which aimed to support seven schools in implementing the smoke-free school
hours policy. Specifically, this PhD study provided knowledge on which and how
intervention activities and mechanisms leveraged the implementation of smokefree school hours – through four studies.
Study 1 identified barriers to and facilitators for organizational readiness to implement the smoke-free school hours policy, which was used to develop the SmokeFree Vocational Schools intervention. Study 2 depicted a programme theory of
how the intervention was expected to leverage policy implementation, which constituted a platform for testing activities and mechanisms. Study 3 assessed associations between the intervention activities and policy implementation outcomes.
As a prerequisite, we developed a set of implementation outcome measures for
the policy. Study 4 investigated the implementation mechanisms, i.e., the reasoning and behavior change, that produced implementation outcomes.
Four mechanisms were likely to leverage policy implementation: (1) a shared vision, (2) legitimacy beliefs regarding sanctioning and enforcement, (3) behavior
change to ensure consistent enforcement, and (4) formal and informal appraisal
of positive impact. Five intervention activities were beneficial implementation
strategies: (1) structural means to achieve a better social environment, (2) a joint
workshop for all staff and managers, (3) clear rules and responsibilities, (4) external support, and (5) delivering activities before the policy was put into force.
Future research should investigate intended and unintended individual-level outcomes associated with policy implementation, namely, cigarette use, smokeless
tobacco use, and stigmatization.
U2 - 10.21996/b71e-z862
DO - 10.21996/b71e-z862
M3 - Ph.D. thesis
PB - Syddansk Universitet. Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet
ER -