The Validity of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Diagnoses in the Danish Patient Registry and the Danish Stroke Registry

  • Stine Munk Hald
  • , Christine Kring Sloth
  • , Mikkel Agger
  • , Maria Therese Schelde-Olesen
  • , Miriam Højholt
  • , Mette Hasle
  • , Helle Bogetofte
  • , Ida Olesrud
  • , Stefanie Binzer
  • , Charlotte Madsen
  • , Willy Krone
  • , Luis Alberto García Rodríguez
  • , Rustam Al Shahi Salman
  • , Jesper Hallas
  • , David Gaist*
  • *Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

118 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: To establish the validity of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) diagnoses in the Danish Stroke Registry (DSR) and the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Patients and Methods: Based on discharge summaries and brain imaging reports, we estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) of a first-ever diagnosis code for ICH (ICD-10, code I61) for all patients in the Region of Southern Denmark (1.2 million) during 2009–2017 according to either DNPR or DSR. We estimated PPVs for any non-traumatic ICH (a-ICH) and spontaneous ICH (s-ICH) alone (ie, without underlying structural cause). We also calculated the sensitivity of these diagnoses in each of the registers. Finally, we classified the location of verified s-ICH. Results: A total of 3,956 patients with ICH diagnosis codes were studied (DSR only: 87; DNPR only: 1,513; both registries: 2,356). In the DSR, the PPVs were 86.5% (95% CI=85.1– 87.8) for a-ICH and 81.8% (95% CI=80.2–83.3) for s-ICH. The PPVs in DNPR (discharge code, primary diagnostic position) were 76.2% (95% CI=74.7–77.6) for a-ICH and 70.2% (95% CI=68.6–71.8) for s-ICH. Sensitivity for a-ICH and s-ICH was 76.4% (95% CI=74.8– 78.0) and 78.7% (95% CI=77.1–80.2) in DSR, and 87.3% (95% CI=86.0–88.5) and 87.7% (95% CI=86.3–88.9) in DNPR. The location of verified s-ICH was lobar (39%), deep (33.6%), infratentorial (13.2%), large unclassifiable (11%), isolated intraventricular (1.9%), or unclas-sifiable due to insufficient information (1.3%). Conclusion: The validity of a-ICH diagnoses is high in both registries. For s-ICH, PPV was higher in DSR, while sensitivity was higher in DNPR. The location of s-ICH was similar to distributions seen in other populations.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinical Epidemiology
Vol/bind12
Sider (fra-til)1313-1325
ISSN1179-1349
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1. dec. 2020

Finansiering

This work is part of a PhD fellowship (SMH) supported by the University of Southern Denmark and the Region of Southern Denmark. The project also received funding from Odense University Hospital (A2926; 70-A3187; 49-A2483) and the A. P . Møller and Chastine Mc-Kinney Møller Foundation (18-L-0214). The activities of DG are supported by a grant from Odense University Hospital. Luis Alberto García Rodríguez reports grants from Bayer AG, personal fees from Bayer AG, outside the submitted work. Rustam Al-Shahi Salman reports grants from British Heart Foundation, grants from The Stroke Association, outside the submitted work.

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'The Validity of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Diagnoses in the Danish Patient Registry and the Danish Stroke Registry'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater