Spring til hovednavigation Spring til søgning Spring til hovedindhold

The impact of PRODIGE 7 on the current worldwide practice of CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A web-based survey and 2021 statement by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI)

  • Vincent C.J. van de Vlasakker
  • , Robin J. Lurvink
  • , Peter H. Cashin
  • , Wim Ceelen
  • , Marcello Deraco
  • , Diane Goéré
  • , Santiago González-Moreno
  • , Kuno Lehmann
  • , Yan Li
  • , Brendan Moran
  • , David L. Morris
  • , Pompiliu Piso
  • , Claudio A. Quadros
  • , Beate Rau
  • , S. P. Somashekhar
  • , Antonio Sommariva
  • , Kurt van der Speeten
  • , John Spiliotis
  • , Paul H. Sugarbaker
  • , Melissa C.C. Teo
  • Vic J. Verwaal, Yutaka Yonemura, Olivier Glehen, Ignace H.J.T. de Hingh*
*Kontaktforfatter
  • Catharina Hospital
  • Uppsala University
  • Ghent University Hospital
  • National Cancer Institute of Milan
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid
  • University Hospital Zurich
  • Beijing Shijitan Hospital
  • Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • St George Hospital
  • Hospital Barmherzige Brüder
  • Hospital São Rafael
  • Charité - University Medicine Berlin
  • Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • University of Padova and Istituto Oncologico Veneto
  • The East Limburg Hospital
  • European Interbalkan Medical Center
  • Washington Hospital Center
  • National Cancer Centre Singapore
  • Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital
  • Lyon Sud Hospital Center
  • Maastricht University

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

Introduction: The PRODIGE 7-trial investigated the additional value of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The results of PRODIGE 7 were presented at the 2018 ASCO meeting showing that 30 min oxaliplatin-based HIPEC did not improve overall survival. The current study investigated the impact of PRODIGE 7 on the worldwide practice of CRS and HIPEC. Materials and methods: CRS-HIPEC experts from 19 countries were invited through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) to complete an online survey concerning the current CRS-HIPEC practice in their hospital and country, and were asked to appraise the effect of PRODIGE 7. Results: The survey was completed by 18/19 experts. Although their personal opinions of CRS-HIPEC were barely influenced by PRODIGE 7, they reported a substantial impact on daily practice. This included a switch towards Mitomycin-C based HIPEC-regimens and prolongation of HIPEC perfusion time, a reduction in the number of referrals from non-HIPEC centers, a reduction in national consensus, the removal of HIPEC from national guidelines, and a reduced reimbursement rate. Conclusion: The PRODIGE 7 has had a major impact on the practice of CRS-HIPEC for CPM worldwide. HIPEC remains an attractive option with potential for control and eradication of disease and further studies into the optimal HIPEC-regimen are urgently needed. Meanwhile, given the complexity of the treatment of patients with CPM, and the proven benefits of optimal CRS, referral of patients with potentially resectable CPM to expert centers is recommended whilst the precise role of HIPEC is further evaluated.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology
Vol/bind47
Udgave nummer11
Sider (fra-til)2888-2892
ISSN0748-7983
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2021

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'The impact of PRODIGE 7 on the current worldwide practice of CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases: A web-based survey and 2021 statement by Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI)'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater