The gray zone: how not imposing a strict lockdown at the beginning of a pandemic can cost many lives

Federico Crudu, Roberta Di Stefano, Giovanni Mellace*, Silvia Tiezzi

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The public debate on the effectiveness of lockdown measures is far from being settled. We estimate the impact of not having implemented a strict lockdown in the Bergamo province, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, despite observing an infection rate in this area similar to the one observed in nearby municipalities where a strict lockdown was instead promptly implemented. We estimate the causal effect of this policy decision on daily excess mortality using the synthetic control method (SCM). We find that about two-thirds of the reported deaths could have been avoided had the Italian government declared a Red Zone in the Bergamo province. We also clarify that, in this context, SCM and difference-in-differences implicitly restrict effect heterogeneity. We provide a way to empirically assess the credibility of this assumption in our setting.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer102580
TidsskriftLabour Economics
Vol/bind89
Antal sider13
ISSN0927-5371
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2024

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'The gray zone: how not imposing a strict lockdown at the beginning of a pandemic can cost many lives'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater