The effectiveness of monitoring patients with acute dyspnea with serial focused ultrasound of the lungs and inferior vena cava

a systematic review

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

44 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Background and objective
Acute dyspnea is one of the most common complaints in the emergency department with high in-hospital mortality. The current methods of monitoring the patients lack both sensitivity and specificity. The objective of the review is to evaluate the effectiveness of monitoring patients with acute dyspnea with repeated focused ultrasound of the lungs (FLUS) and inferior vena cava (IVC) compared to standard care.

Methods
A systematic search was conducted on 12th of June 2018 on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The grey literature was sought in OpenGrey and ProQuest. We included trials with adult patients with acute dyspnea admitted to a hospital who underwent either repeated FLUS or IVC scans or both. In the 1837 studies identified, first titles and abstracts were screened. 23 studies were selected for full-text screening, and of those, 7 were chosen for data extraction. Additional 5 papers were identified through systematic snowballing. Risk of bias was accessed according to the study design.

Results
Twelve studies were included (824 patients). Generally, the studies had small study populations, and no sample size calculations were made. Only patients suspected of heart failure were investigated, and the studies were methodological heterogeneous. Four studies reported that patients with a reduction in either B-lines, IVC size or an increased IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) had fewer readmissions and deaths. Three studies reported on optimized treatment in relation to the same findings. All studies reported either a reduction of B-lines, IVC size or an increase in IVCCI as a sign of possible decreased congestion of fluid but few studies related the findings to other parameters.

Conclusion
Repeated FLUS and IVC scans showed promising results as a monitoring tool, but further investigations with larger study populations and with patients with undifferentiated dyspnea are needed to generalize the findings.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato12. jun. 2019
Antal sider1
StatusUdgivet - 12. jun. 2019
Begivenhed18th International Conference on Emergency Medicine - Coex Center, Seoul, Sydkorea
Varighed: 12. jun. 201915. jun. 2019
http://www.icem2019.com/

Konference

Konference18th International Conference on Emergency Medicine
LokationCoex Center
LandSydkorea
BySeoul
Periode12/06/201915/06/2019
Internetadresse

Fingeraftryk

Inferior Vena Cava
Physiologic Monitoring
Lung
Literature
Hospital Mortality
PubMed
Sample Size
Population
Hospital Emergency Service

Citer dette

@conference{5d0ddd976b594a5b8015c8f58f27bc4e,
title = "The effectiveness of monitoring patients with acute dyspnea with serial focused ultrasound of the lungs and inferior vena cava: a systematic review",
abstract = "Background and objectiveAcute dyspnea is one of the most common complaints in the emergency department with high in-hospital mortality. The current methods of monitoring the patients lack both sensitivity and specificity. The objective of the review is to evaluate the effectiveness of monitoring patients with acute dyspnea with repeated focused ultrasound of the lungs (FLUS) and inferior vena cava (IVC) compared to standard care. MethodsA systematic search was conducted on 12th of June 2018 on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The grey literature was sought in OpenGrey and ProQuest. We included trials with adult patients with acute dyspnea admitted to a hospital who underwent either repeated FLUS or IVC scans or both. In the 1837 studies identified, first titles and abstracts were screened. 23 studies were selected for full-text screening, and of those, 7 were chosen for data extraction. Additional 5 papers were identified through systematic snowballing. Risk of bias was accessed according to the study design.ResultsTwelve studies were included (824 patients). Generally, the studies had small study populations, and no sample size calculations were made. Only patients suspected of heart failure were investigated, and the studies were methodological heterogeneous. Four studies reported that patients with a reduction in either B-lines, IVC size or an increased IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) had fewer readmissions and deaths. Three studies reported on optimized treatment in relation to the same findings. All studies reported either a reduction of B-lines, IVC size or an increase in IVCCI as a sign of possible decreased congestion of fluid but few studies related the findings to other parameters.ConclusionRepeated FLUS and IVC scans showed promising results as a monitoring tool, but further investigations with larger study populations and with patients with undifferentiated dyspnea are needed to generalize the findings.",
keywords = "Ultrasound, Lung ultrasound, Point-of-care ultrasound, Monitoring, dyspnea, Inferior vena cava, Focused cardiac ultrasound",
author = "{Dan Arvig}, Michael and Laursen, {Christian Borbjerg} and Niels Jacobsen and Peter G{\ae}de and Lassen, {Annmarie Touborg}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "12",
language = "English",
pages = "56",
note = "null ; Conference date: 12-06-2019 Through 15-06-2019",
url = "http://www.icem2019.com/",

}

The effectiveness of monitoring patients with acute dyspnea with serial focused ultrasound of the lungs and inferior vena cava : a systematic review. / Dan Arvig, Michael; Laursen, Christian Borbjerg; Jacobsen, Niels; Gæde, Peter; Lassen, Annmarie Touborg.

2019. 56 Abstract fra 18th International Conference on Emergency Medicine, Seoul, Sydkorea.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftKonferenceabstrakt til konferenceForskningpeer review

TY - ABST

T1 - The effectiveness of monitoring patients with acute dyspnea with serial focused ultrasound of the lungs and inferior vena cava

T2 - a systematic review

AU - Dan Arvig, Michael

AU - Laursen, Christian Borbjerg

AU - Jacobsen, Niels

AU - Gæde, Peter

AU - Lassen, Annmarie Touborg

PY - 2019/6/12

Y1 - 2019/6/12

N2 - Background and objectiveAcute dyspnea is one of the most common complaints in the emergency department with high in-hospital mortality. The current methods of monitoring the patients lack both sensitivity and specificity. The objective of the review is to evaluate the effectiveness of monitoring patients with acute dyspnea with repeated focused ultrasound of the lungs (FLUS) and inferior vena cava (IVC) compared to standard care. MethodsA systematic search was conducted on 12th of June 2018 on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The grey literature was sought in OpenGrey and ProQuest. We included trials with adult patients with acute dyspnea admitted to a hospital who underwent either repeated FLUS or IVC scans or both. In the 1837 studies identified, first titles and abstracts were screened. 23 studies were selected for full-text screening, and of those, 7 were chosen for data extraction. Additional 5 papers were identified through systematic snowballing. Risk of bias was accessed according to the study design.ResultsTwelve studies were included (824 patients). Generally, the studies had small study populations, and no sample size calculations were made. Only patients suspected of heart failure were investigated, and the studies were methodological heterogeneous. Four studies reported that patients with a reduction in either B-lines, IVC size or an increased IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) had fewer readmissions and deaths. Three studies reported on optimized treatment in relation to the same findings. All studies reported either a reduction of B-lines, IVC size or an increase in IVCCI as a sign of possible decreased congestion of fluid but few studies related the findings to other parameters.ConclusionRepeated FLUS and IVC scans showed promising results as a monitoring tool, but further investigations with larger study populations and with patients with undifferentiated dyspnea are needed to generalize the findings.

AB - Background and objectiveAcute dyspnea is one of the most common complaints in the emergency department with high in-hospital mortality. The current methods of monitoring the patients lack both sensitivity and specificity. The objective of the review is to evaluate the effectiveness of monitoring patients with acute dyspnea with repeated focused ultrasound of the lungs (FLUS) and inferior vena cava (IVC) compared to standard care. MethodsA systematic search was conducted on 12th of June 2018 on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The grey literature was sought in OpenGrey and ProQuest. We included trials with adult patients with acute dyspnea admitted to a hospital who underwent either repeated FLUS or IVC scans or both. In the 1837 studies identified, first titles and abstracts were screened. 23 studies were selected for full-text screening, and of those, 7 were chosen for data extraction. Additional 5 papers were identified through systematic snowballing. Risk of bias was accessed according to the study design.ResultsTwelve studies were included (824 patients). Generally, the studies had small study populations, and no sample size calculations were made. Only patients suspected of heart failure were investigated, and the studies were methodological heterogeneous. Four studies reported that patients with a reduction in either B-lines, IVC size or an increased IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) had fewer readmissions and deaths. Three studies reported on optimized treatment in relation to the same findings. All studies reported either a reduction of B-lines, IVC size or an increase in IVCCI as a sign of possible decreased congestion of fluid but few studies related the findings to other parameters.ConclusionRepeated FLUS and IVC scans showed promising results as a monitoring tool, but further investigations with larger study populations and with patients with undifferentiated dyspnea are needed to generalize the findings.

KW - Ultrasound

KW - Lung ultrasound

KW - Point-of-care ultrasound

KW - Monitoring

KW - dyspnea

KW - Inferior vena cava

KW - Focused cardiac ultrasound

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

SP - 56

ER -