THE CLAUSEHOOD OF THE ENHANCING b-CLAUSE

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference-proceedingBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

The aim of this paper is to discuss IFG’s description of certain subordinate enhancing clauses (of e.g. time) as non-constitutional b-clauses as opposed to prepositional phrases functioning as Circumstance constituents in the simplex clause. This description assumes that the subordinate enhancing clause has the full experiential, interpersonal and textual potential of a clause and that it – unlike the prepositional phrase – realises the semantic categories of figure, move and message. We shall discuss this realisational relationship and argue that the anchoring in semantic categories does not justify different descriptions of the prepositional phrase and the subordinate clause.
OriginalsprogDansk
Titelproceedings of the 27th european systemic functional linguistics conference
Antal sider8
Publikationsdato2019
Sider141-149
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Citer dette

Andersen, T. H., & Holsting, A. (2019). THE CLAUSEHOOD OF THE ENHANCING b-CLAUSE. I proceedings of the 27th european systemic functional linguistics conference (s. 141-149)
Andersen, Thomas Hestbæk ; Holsting, Alexandra. / THE CLAUSEHOOD OF THE ENHANCING b-CLAUSE. proceedings of the 27th european systemic functional linguistics conference. 2019. s. 141-149
@inbook{cda2c4eb5acd4dea96676a6d075f6e68,
title = "THE CLAUSEHOOD OF THE ENHANCING b-CLAUSE",
abstract = "The aim of this paper is to discuss IFG’s description of certain subordinate enhancing clauses (of e.g. time) as non-constitutional b-clauses as opposed to prepositional phrases functioning as Circumstance constituents in the simplex clause. This description assumes that the subordinate enhancing clause has the full experiential, interpersonal and textual potential of a clause and that it – unlike the prepositional phrase – realises the semantic categories of figure, move and message. We shall discuss this realisational relationship and argue that the anchoring in semantic categories does not justify different descriptions of the prepositional phrase and the subordinate clause.",
author = "Andersen, {Thomas Hestb{\ae}k} and Alexandra Holsting",
year = "2019",
language = "Dansk",
pages = "141--149",
booktitle = "proceedings of the 27th european systemic functional linguistics conference",

}

Andersen, TH & Holsting, A 2019, THE CLAUSEHOOD OF THE ENHANCING b-CLAUSE. i proceedings of the 27th european systemic functional linguistics conference. s. 141-149.

THE CLAUSEHOOD OF THE ENHANCING b-CLAUSE. / Andersen, Thomas Hestbæk; Holsting, Alexandra.

proceedings of the 27th european systemic functional linguistics conference. 2019. s. 141-149.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference-proceedingBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - THE CLAUSEHOOD OF THE ENHANCING b-CLAUSE

AU - Andersen, Thomas Hestbæk

AU - Holsting, Alexandra

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The aim of this paper is to discuss IFG’s description of certain subordinate enhancing clauses (of e.g. time) as non-constitutional b-clauses as opposed to prepositional phrases functioning as Circumstance constituents in the simplex clause. This description assumes that the subordinate enhancing clause has the full experiential, interpersonal and textual potential of a clause and that it – unlike the prepositional phrase – realises the semantic categories of figure, move and message. We shall discuss this realisational relationship and argue that the anchoring in semantic categories does not justify different descriptions of the prepositional phrase and the subordinate clause.

AB - The aim of this paper is to discuss IFG’s description of certain subordinate enhancing clauses (of e.g. time) as non-constitutional b-clauses as opposed to prepositional phrases functioning as Circumstance constituents in the simplex clause. This description assumes that the subordinate enhancing clause has the full experiential, interpersonal and textual potential of a clause and that it – unlike the prepositional phrase – realises the semantic categories of figure, move and message. We shall discuss this realisational relationship and argue that the anchoring in semantic categories does not justify different descriptions of the prepositional phrase and the subordinate clause.

M3 - Bidrag til bog/antologi

SP - 141

EP - 149

BT - proceedings of the 27th european systemic functional linguistics conference

ER -

Andersen TH, Holsting A. THE CLAUSEHOOD OF THE ENHANCING b-CLAUSE. I proceedings of the 27th european systemic functional linguistics conference. 2019. s. 141-149