Technology in L1

A Review of Empirical Research Projects in Scandinavia 1994-2014

Nikolaj Frydensbjerg Elf, Thorkild Hanghøj, Håvard Skaar, Per-Olof Erixon

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

114 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

In recent decades, several Scandinavian research projects have had an explicit focus on how technology intervenes in L1 (or so-called Mother Tongue Education) practices in Swedish, Norwegian and Danish educational contexts, and how this may impact on understanding of the subject. There is currently no systematic overview of the documented possibilities and challenges related to the use of technology in L1. At the same time, there is terminological confusion in use of ‘technology’ and related concepts in L1. Finally, there is a general lack of critical reflection on the relation between technological developments, political rhetoric, and the development of L1 teaching and learning as a social practice related to specific contexts and actors. Thus, the paper attempts to answer three interrelated research questions: 1) what do we mean when we talk about ‘technology’ in L1?; 2) based on a systematic review of empirical stud-ies, what characterizes the research field?; and 3) for discussion, which broader implications does the review suggest for a rethinking of L1 in terms of practice and research? Introducing the notion of educa-tional boundary objects, a theoretical framework is developed, which suggests four metaphors for un-derstanding technology within L1: as a tool, as media, as socialization, and as literacy practices. These are found useful for analyzing and comparing both theoretical perspectives and empirical research on L1. A key finding of the study is that, although the included research is characterized by a large degree of diversity, the conceptualization of technology as media is a dominating approach which downplays aesthetic, critical and tool-oriented perspectives. Another finding is the large number of studies that focus on student practices within L1 and the relationship to out-of-school literacy practices. A final find-ing is the emphasis on teacher uncertainty regarding how and why to integrate technology within exist-ing paradigms of the subject. This calls for further research on how technology may be justified in L1 practice, including various forms of teacher education.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftL1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature (Online Edition)
Vol/bind15
Udgave nummerSpecial issue
Sider (fra-til)1-89
ISSN1578-6617
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 26. maj 2015

Fingeraftryk

Scandinavia
empirical research
research project
literacy
Research Projects
Empirical Research
mother tongue
teacher
technical development
field research
socialization
metaphor
education
rhetoric
aesthetics
uncertainty
paradigm
lack
Teaching

Citer dette

@article{c775916757dc40d7b6c646e2ff9c384c,
title = "Technology in L1: A Review of Empirical Research Projects in Scandinavia 1994-2014",
abstract = "In recent decades, several Scandinavian research projects have had an explicit focus on how technology intervenes in L1 (or so-called Mother Tongue Education) practices in Swedish, Norwegian and Danish educational contexts, and how this may impact on understanding of the subject. There is currently no systematic overview of the documented possibilities and challenges related to the use of technology in L1. At the same time, there is terminological confusion in use of ‘technology’ and related concepts in L1. Finally, there is a general lack of critical reflection on the relation between technological developments, political rhetoric, and the development of L1 teaching and learning as a social practice related to specific contexts and actors. Thus, the paper attempts to answer three interrelated research questions: 1) what do we mean when we talk about ‘technology’ in L1?; 2) based on a systematic review of empirical stud-ies, what characterizes the research field?; and 3) for discussion, which broader implications does the review suggest for a rethinking of L1 in terms of practice and research? Introducing the notion of educa-tional boundary objects, a theoretical framework is developed, which suggests four metaphors for un-derstanding technology within L1: as a tool, as media, as socialization, and as literacy practices. These are found useful for analyzing and comparing both theoretical perspectives and empirical research on L1. A key finding of the study is that, although the included research is characterized by a large degree of diversity, the conceptualization of technology as media is a dominating approach which downplays aesthetic, critical and tool-oriented perspectives. Another finding is the large number of studies that focus on student practices within L1 and the relationship to out-of-school literacy practices. A final find-ing is the emphasis on teacher uncertainty regarding how and why to integrate technology within exist-ing paradigms of the subject. This calls for further research on how technology may be justified in L1 practice, including various forms of teacher education.",
keywords = "Media, Policy, Review Methodology, Teacher education, Technology in L1 education",
author = "Elf, {Nikolaj Frydensbjerg} and Thorkild Hangh{\o}j and H{\aa}vard Skaar and Per-Olof Erixon",
note = "Special Issue Paradoxes and negotiations in Scandinavian L1 research in languages, literatures and literacies. Guest edited by Ellen Krogh and Sylvi Penne",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "26",
doi = "10.17239/L1ESLL-2015.15.01.03",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--89",
journal = "L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature",
issn = "1578-6617",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "Special issue",

}

Technology in L1 : A Review of Empirical Research Projects in Scandinavia 1994-2014. / Elf, Nikolaj Frydensbjerg; Hanghøj, Thorkild; Skaar, Håvard; Erixon, Per-Olof.

I: L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature (Online Edition), Bind 15, Nr. Special issue, 26.05.2015, s. 1-89.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technology in L1

T2 - A Review of Empirical Research Projects in Scandinavia 1994-2014

AU - Elf, Nikolaj Frydensbjerg

AU - Hanghøj, Thorkild

AU - Skaar, Håvard

AU - Erixon, Per-Olof

N1 - Special Issue Paradoxes and negotiations in Scandinavian L1 research in languages, literatures and literacies. Guest edited by Ellen Krogh and Sylvi Penne

PY - 2015/5/26

Y1 - 2015/5/26

N2 - In recent decades, several Scandinavian research projects have had an explicit focus on how technology intervenes in L1 (or so-called Mother Tongue Education) practices in Swedish, Norwegian and Danish educational contexts, and how this may impact on understanding of the subject. There is currently no systematic overview of the documented possibilities and challenges related to the use of technology in L1. At the same time, there is terminological confusion in use of ‘technology’ and related concepts in L1. Finally, there is a general lack of critical reflection on the relation between technological developments, political rhetoric, and the development of L1 teaching and learning as a social practice related to specific contexts and actors. Thus, the paper attempts to answer three interrelated research questions: 1) what do we mean when we talk about ‘technology’ in L1?; 2) based on a systematic review of empirical stud-ies, what characterizes the research field?; and 3) for discussion, which broader implications does the review suggest for a rethinking of L1 in terms of practice and research? Introducing the notion of educa-tional boundary objects, a theoretical framework is developed, which suggests four metaphors for un-derstanding technology within L1: as a tool, as media, as socialization, and as literacy practices. These are found useful for analyzing and comparing both theoretical perspectives and empirical research on L1. A key finding of the study is that, although the included research is characterized by a large degree of diversity, the conceptualization of technology as media is a dominating approach which downplays aesthetic, critical and tool-oriented perspectives. Another finding is the large number of studies that focus on student practices within L1 and the relationship to out-of-school literacy practices. A final find-ing is the emphasis on teacher uncertainty regarding how and why to integrate technology within exist-ing paradigms of the subject. This calls for further research on how technology may be justified in L1 practice, including various forms of teacher education.

AB - In recent decades, several Scandinavian research projects have had an explicit focus on how technology intervenes in L1 (or so-called Mother Tongue Education) practices in Swedish, Norwegian and Danish educational contexts, and how this may impact on understanding of the subject. There is currently no systematic overview of the documented possibilities and challenges related to the use of technology in L1. At the same time, there is terminological confusion in use of ‘technology’ and related concepts in L1. Finally, there is a general lack of critical reflection on the relation between technological developments, political rhetoric, and the development of L1 teaching and learning as a social practice related to specific contexts and actors. Thus, the paper attempts to answer three interrelated research questions: 1) what do we mean when we talk about ‘technology’ in L1?; 2) based on a systematic review of empirical stud-ies, what characterizes the research field?; and 3) for discussion, which broader implications does the review suggest for a rethinking of L1 in terms of practice and research? Introducing the notion of educa-tional boundary objects, a theoretical framework is developed, which suggests four metaphors for un-derstanding technology within L1: as a tool, as media, as socialization, and as literacy practices. These are found useful for analyzing and comparing both theoretical perspectives and empirical research on L1. A key finding of the study is that, although the included research is characterized by a large degree of diversity, the conceptualization of technology as media is a dominating approach which downplays aesthetic, critical and tool-oriented perspectives. Another finding is the large number of studies that focus on student practices within L1 and the relationship to out-of-school literacy practices. A final find-ing is the emphasis on teacher uncertainty regarding how and why to integrate technology within exist-ing paradigms of the subject. This calls for further research on how technology may be justified in L1 practice, including various forms of teacher education.

KW - Media

KW - Policy

KW - Review Methodology

KW - Teacher education

KW - Technology in L1 education

U2 - 10.17239/L1ESLL-2015.15.01.03

DO - 10.17239/L1ESLL-2015.15.01.03

M3 - Review

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 89

JO - L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature

JF - L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature

SN - 1578-6617

IS - Special issue

ER -