Technicians or patient advocates?--still a valid question (results of focus group discussions with pharmacists)

Anna Birna Almarsdóttir, Janine Marie Morgall

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

New legislation went into effect in Iceland in March 1996 making it the first Nordic country to liberate their drug distribution system. The term liberalization implies the abolishment of the professional monopoly in that ownership was not tied to the pharmacy profession anymore. Focus group discussions with community pharmacists in the capital area Reykjavík and rural areas were employed to answer the research question: How has the pharmacists' societal role evolved after the legislation and what are the implications for pharmacy practice? The results showed firstly that the public image and the self-image of the pharmacist has changed in the short time since the legislative change. The pharmacists generally said that their patient contact is deteriorating due to the discount wars, the rural pharmacists being more optimistic, and believing in a future competition based on quality. Secondly, the results showed that the pharmacists have difficulties reconciling their technical paradigm with a legislative and professional will specifying customer and patient focus. This study describes the challenges of a new legislation with a market focus for community pharmacists whose education emphasized technical skills. This account of the changes in the drug distribution system in Iceland highlights some of the implications for pharmacists internationally.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPharmacy World & Science
Vol/bind21
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)127-31
Antal sider5
ISSN0928-1231
StatusUdgivet - jun. 1999

Fingeraftryk

Focus Groups
Pharmacists
Legislation
Iceland
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Education
Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
Ownership
Research

Citer dette

Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna ; Morgall, Janine Marie. / Technicians or patient advocates?--still a valid question (results of focus group discussions with pharmacists). I: Pharmacy World & Science. 1999 ; Bind 21, Nr. 3. s. 127-31.
@article{f5deb3b89a9f41a28376d417d6d28d01,
title = "Technicians or patient advocates?--still a valid question (results of focus group discussions with pharmacists)",
abstract = "New legislation went into effect in Iceland in March 1996 making it the first Nordic country to liberate their drug distribution system. The term liberalization implies the abolishment of the professional monopoly in that ownership was not tied to the pharmacy profession anymore. Focus group discussions with community pharmacists in the capital area Reykjav{\'i}k and rural areas were employed to answer the research question: How has the pharmacists' societal role evolved after the legislation and what are the implications for pharmacy practice? The results showed firstly that the public image and the self-image of the pharmacist has changed in the short time since the legislative change. The pharmacists generally said that their patient contact is deteriorating due to the discount wars, the rural pharmacists being more optimistic, and believing in a future competition based on quality. Secondly, the results showed that the pharmacists have difficulties reconciling their technical paradigm with a legislative and professional will specifying customer and patient focus. This study describes the challenges of a new legislation with a market focus for community pharmacists whose education emphasized technical skills. This account of the changes in the drug distribution system in Iceland highlights some of the implications for pharmacists internationally.",
keywords = "Denmark, Focus Groups, Patient Advocacy, Pharmacies, Pharmacists, Public Relations",
author = "Almarsd{\'o}ttir, {Anna Birna} and Morgall, {Janine Marie}",
year = "1999",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "127--31",
journal = "Pharmacy World & Science",
issn = "0928-1231",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Technicians or patient advocates?--still a valid question (results of focus group discussions with pharmacists). / Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna; Morgall, Janine Marie.

I: Pharmacy World & Science, Bind 21, Nr. 3, 06.1999, s. 127-31.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technicians or patient advocates?--still a valid question (results of focus group discussions with pharmacists)

AU - Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna

AU - Morgall, Janine Marie

PY - 1999/6

Y1 - 1999/6

N2 - New legislation went into effect in Iceland in March 1996 making it the first Nordic country to liberate their drug distribution system. The term liberalization implies the abolishment of the professional monopoly in that ownership was not tied to the pharmacy profession anymore. Focus group discussions with community pharmacists in the capital area Reykjavík and rural areas were employed to answer the research question: How has the pharmacists' societal role evolved after the legislation and what are the implications for pharmacy practice? The results showed firstly that the public image and the self-image of the pharmacist has changed in the short time since the legislative change. The pharmacists generally said that their patient contact is deteriorating due to the discount wars, the rural pharmacists being more optimistic, and believing in a future competition based on quality. Secondly, the results showed that the pharmacists have difficulties reconciling their technical paradigm with a legislative and professional will specifying customer and patient focus. This study describes the challenges of a new legislation with a market focus for community pharmacists whose education emphasized technical skills. This account of the changes in the drug distribution system in Iceland highlights some of the implications for pharmacists internationally.

AB - New legislation went into effect in Iceland in March 1996 making it the first Nordic country to liberate their drug distribution system. The term liberalization implies the abolishment of the professional monopoly in that ownership was not tied to the pharmacy profession anymore. Focus group discussions with community pharmacists in the capital area Reykjavík and rural areas were employed to answer the research question: How has the pharmacists' societal role evolved after the legislation and what are the implications for pharmacy practice? The results showed firstly that the public image and the self-image of the pharmacist has changed in the short time since the legislative change. The pharmacists generally said that their patient contact is deteriorating due to the discount wars, the rural pharmacists being more optimistic, and believing in a future competition based on quality. Secondly, the results showed that the pharmacists have difficulties reconciling their technical paradigm with a legislative and professional will specifying customer and patient focus. This study describes the challenges of a new legislation with a market focus for community pharmacists whose education emphasized technical skills. This account of the changes in the drug distribution system in Iceland highlights some of the implications for pharmacists internationally.

KW - Denmark

KW - Focus Groups

KW - Patient Advocacy

KW - Pharmacies

KW - Pharmacists

KW - Public Relations

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 10427582

VL - 21

SP - 127

EP - 131

JO - Pharmacy World & Science

JF - Pharmacy World & Science

SN - 0928-1231

IS - 3

ER -