Success factors in global project management

A study of practices in organizational support and the effects on cost and schedule

Knut R. Fossum*, Jean C. Binder, Tage K. Madsen, Wenche Aarseth, Bjorn Andersen

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and complete the existing lack of quantitative data at the crossroads between organizational support (OS) practices and project management success in global projects (GPs) and discuss implication of the results in perspective of the theory–practice gap. Design/methodology/approach: Building on classical organizational theory and GP knowledge areas, a survey addressing GP practitioners was designed. This paper focuses on OS practices as success factors and addresses a subset of the survey (1,170 respondents across 74 countries). Findings: OS practices included in the study were found to have high importance for managerial success. OS practices for selection and training of team members show significant correlation with project efficiency but have low adaptation in many organizations. Statistically significant correlations were found to be weaker than expected, indicating that the relation between OS practices (as success factors) and project efficiency (as success criteria) is more complex than expected. Research limitations/implications: The work constitutes opinion-based research and is vulnerable to variations in OS practices and the definition of success in different organizations and industries. The granularity level of the theoretical framework brought about relative high-level survey questions and may impact the applicability of the results. Practical implications: To improve the efficiency of GPs, better implementation of OS practices for selection processes and training personnel has been suggested. Originality/value: The theoretical alignment of classical organizational variables with GP knowledge areas and associated practices provides an original approach to the “theory–practice gap” discourse.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Managing Projects in Business
ISSN1753-8378
DOI
StatusE-pub ahead of print - 2019

Fingeraftryk

Project management
Costs
Success factors
Organizational support
Global projects
Schedule
Industry

Citer dette

@article{7d97aaa9efb0463d9e6ee6b82cb178ac,
title = "Success factors in global project management: A study of practices in organizational support and the effects on cost and schedule",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and complete the existing lack of quantitative data at the crossroads between organizational support (OS) practices and project management success in global projects (GPs) and discuss implication of the results in perspective of the theory–practice gap. Design/methodology/approach: Building on classical organizational theory and GP knowledge areas, a survey addressing GP practitioners was designed. This paper focuses on OS practices as success factors and addresses a subset of the survey (1,170 respondents across 74 countries). Findings: OS practices included in the study were found to have high importance for managerial success. OS practices for selection and training of team members show significant correlation with project efficiency but have low adaptation in many organizations. Statistically significant correlations were found to be weaker than expected, indicating that the relation between OS practices (as success factors) and project efficiency (as success criteria) is more complex than expected. Research limitations/implications: The work constitutes opinion-based research and is vulnerable to variations in OS practices and the definition of success in different organizations and industries. The granularity level of the theoretical framework brought about relative high-level survey questions and may impact the applicability of the results. Practical implications: To improve the efficiency of GPs, better implementation of OS practices for selection processes and training personnel has been suggested. Originality/value: The theoretical alignment of classical organizational variables with GP knowledge areas and associated practices provides an original approach to the “theory–practice gap” discourse.",
keywords = "Global projects, Practice studies, Project success",
author = "Fossum, {Knut R.} and Binder, {Jean C.} and Madsen, {Tage K.} and Wenche Aarseth and Bjorn Andersen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1108/IJMPB-09-2018-0182",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Managing Projects in Business",
issn = "1753-8378",
publisher = "JAI Press",

}

Success factors in global project management : A study of practices in organizational support and the effects on cost and schedule. / Fossum, Knut R.; Binder, Jean C.; Madsen, Tage K.; Aarseth, Wenche; Andersen, Bjorn.

I: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Success factors in global project management

T2 - A study of practices in organizational support and the effects on cost and schedule

AU - Fossum, Knut R.

AU - Binder, Jean C.

AU - Madsen, Tage K.

AU - Aarseth, Wenche

AU - Andersen, Bjorn

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and complete the existing lack of quantitative data at the crossroads between organizational support (OS) practices and project management success in global projects (GPs) and discuss implication of the results in perspective of the theory–practice gap. Design/methodology/approach: Building on classical organizational theory and GP knowledge areas, a survey addressing GP practitioners was designed. This paper focuses on OS practices as success factors and addresses a subset of the survey (1,170 respondents across 74 countries). Findings: OS practices included in the study were found to have high importance for managerial success. OS practices for selection and training of team members show significant correlation with project efficiency but have low adaptation in many organizations. Statistically significant correlations were found to be weaker than expected, indicating that the relation between OS practices (as success factors) and project efficiency (as success criteria) is more complex than expected. Research limitations/implications: The work constitutes opinion-based research and is vulnerable to variations in OS practices and the definition of success in different organizations and industries. The granularity level of the theoretical framework brought about relative high-level survey questions and may impact the applicability of the results. Practical implications: To improve the efficiency of GPs, better implementation of OS practices for selection processes and training personnel has been suggested. Originality/value: The theoretical alignment of classical organizational variables with GP knowledge areas and associated practices provides an original approach to the “theory–practice gap” discourse.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify and complete the existing lack of quantitative data at the crossroads between organizational support (OS) practices and project management success in global projects (GPs) and discuss implication of the results in perspective of the theory–practice gap. Design/methodology/approach: Building on classical organizational theory and GP knowledge areas, a survey addressing GP practitioners was designed. This paper focuses on OS practices as success factors and addresses a subset of the survey (1,170 respondents across 74 countries). Findings: OS practices included in the study were found to have high importance for managerial success. OS practices for selection and training of team members show significant correlation with project efficiency but have low adaptation in many organizations. Statistically significant correlations were found to be weaker than expected, indicating that the relation between OS practices (as success factors) and project efficiency (as success criteria) is more complex than expected. Research limitations/implications: The work constitutes opinion-based research and is vulnerable to variations in OS practices and the definition of success in different organizations and industries. The granularity level of the theoretical framework brought about relative high-level survey questions and may impact the applicability of the results. Practical implications: To improve the efficiency of GPs, better implementation of OS practices for selection processes and training personnel has been suggested. Originality/value: The theoretical alignment of classical organizational variables with GP knowledge areas and associated practices provides an original approach to the “theory–practice gap” discourse.

KW - Global projects

KW - Practice studies

KW - Project success

U2 - 10.1108/IJMPB-09-2018-0182

DO - 10.1108/IJMPB-09-2018-0182

M3 - Journal article

JO - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

JF - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business

SN - 1753-8378

ER -