Screening for technical flaws in multiple-choice items: A generalizability study

Lotte Dyhrberg O'Neill*, Sara Mathilde Radl Mortensen, Cita Nørgaard, Anne Lindebo Holm, Ulla Glenert Friis

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

65 Downloads (Pure)


Construction errors in multiple-choice items are quite prevalent and constitute threats to test validity of multiple-choice tests. Currently very little research on the usefulness of systematic item screening by local review committees before test administration seem to exist. The aim of this study was therefore to examine validity and feasibility aspects of review committee screening for item flaws. We examined the reliability of item reviewers’ independent judgments of the presence/absence of item flaws with a generalizability study design and found only moderate reliability using five reviewers. Statistical analyses of actual exam scores could be a more efficient way of identifying flaws and improving average item discrimination of tests in local contexts. The question of validity of human judgments of item flaws is important - not just for sufficiently sound quality assurance procedures of tests in local test contexts - but also for the global research on item flaws.
TidsskriftDansk Universitetspaedagogisk Tidsskrift
Udgave nummer26
Sider (fra-til)51-65
StatusUdgivet - 1. apr. 2019


  • Multiple Choice Tests
  • Validity
  • Generalizability
  • Item flaws
  • Quality Assurance


Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Screening for technical flaws in multiple-choice items: A generalizability study'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.