RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine—proven safe and effective?

Anders Björkman*, Christine Stabell Benn, Peter Aaby, Allan Schapira

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftKommentar/debatForskningpeer review

Abstract

In October, 2021, WHO recommended that the RTS,S malaria vaccine, with its strong safety profile and high impact, be provided to children from age 5 months in regions with moderate to high Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission. The evidence base included phase 3 trials in seven African countries and an ongoing malaria vaccine implementation programme (MVIP) in three African countries. We highlight problems with the MVIP mortality data, including potential confounding, inappropriate use of severe malaria as a surrogate marker, a statistically non-significant effect, and assessment after 2 years instead of the stipulated 4 years, which could have inflated the benefits and deflated the risks associated with the vaccine. We conclude that the claimed impact of the MVIP on mortality is not based on enough scientific evidence and that the MVIP findings do not rule out the possibility of increased mortality among vaccinated girls compared with vaccinated boys, as observed in the phase 3 studies. The MVIP should adhere fully to the planned analyses and the data should be made available for independent assessment. Roll-out of the vaccine elsewhere should include rigorous evaluation, especially of its safety.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftThe Lancet Infectious Diseases
Vol/bind23
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)e318-e322
ISSN1473-3099
DOI
StatusUdgivet - aug. 2023

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine—proven safe and effective?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater