Review of Kojima " Which Classical Correspondence is Valid in Intuitionistic Modal Logic?"

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

44 Downloads (Pure)
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftMathematical Reviews
Udgave nummerReview MR2876985
ISSN0025-5629
StatusUdgivet - 2012

Citer dette

@article{9943fd42b1b24cf4b67d71637403b5cc,
title = "Review of Kojima {"} Which Classical Correspondence is Valid in Intuitionistic Modal Logic?{"}",
author = "Klaus Robering",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
journal = "e-M R Sections",
issn = "2326-7798",
publisher = "American Mathematical Society",
number = "Review MR2876985",

}

Review of Kojima " Which Classical Correspondence is Valid in Intuitionistic Modal Logic?". / Robering, Klaus.

I: Mathematical Reviews, Nr. Review MR2876985, 2012.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of Kojima " Which Classical Correspondence is Valid in Intuitionistic Modal Logic?"

AU - Robering, Klaus

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

M3 - Review

JO - e-M R Sections

JF - e-M R Sections

SN - 2326-7798

IS - Review MR2876985

ER -