Abstract
Objective We examined the hypothesis that baseline retinal vascular geometry in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) predicts disease activity 6 months after panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Methods and analysis We included 47 eyes from 40 patients with treatment-naïve PDR in a 6-month prospective study. Diagnosis of PDR and disease activity was evaluated by wide-ï¬ eld ï¬ uorescein angiography (Optomap, Optos, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK). At baseline and 6-month follow-up, the retinal vessel geometry was measured on optic disc centred images using semiautomated software Vessel Assessment and Measurement Platform for Images of the Retina (VAMPIRE, Dundee, Scotland). Results At baseline, mean age and duration of diabetes was 51.6 and 21.4 years, and 62.5% were men. Seventeen eyes (36.2%) had progression of PDR during follow-up. At baseline, we found higher retinal arteriolar calibre (31.3±0.8 vs 28.8±0.8 pixels, p=0.02) and venous fractal dimension (F D) (1.257±0.011 vs 1.222±0.011, p=0.02) in eyes with progression of PDR as compared with eyes with non-progression. In a multiple logistic regression model, both higher retinal arteriolar calibre (OR 1.34, 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.64, p<0.01) and venular F D (OR 1.15, 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.27, p<0.01) predicted progression of PDR. Venular calibre was seen to increase from baseline to month six regardless of disease progression (non-progression 45.0±0.7 vs 52.7±1.8 pixels, p<0.01; progression 46.2±0.8 vs 51.0±1.7 pixels, p<0.01). Conclusion Our prospective study showed that arteriolar calibre and venular F D at baseline were predictive of disease activity 6 months after PRP treatment in patients with treatment-naïve PDR.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Artikelnummer | e000661 |
Tidsskrift | BMJ Open Ophthalmology |
Vol/bind | 6 |
Udgave nummer | 1 |
ISSN | 2397-3269 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 22. mar. 2021 |
Bibliografisk note
Funding Information:Acknowledgements This work was supported by The Velux Foundation and The Region of Southern Denmark. None of the funders have been involved in any decisions regarding this study, and the authors declare no duality of interest associated with this article.
Publisher Copyright:
©