Justice and Social Cohesion: Some conservative perspectives

Bidragets oversatte titel: Retfærdighed og Sammenhængskraft

Søren Hviid Pedersen

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftPaperForskningpeer review

Resumé

In the wake of recent debates on multiculturalism and value-pluralism, the pressing questions now focuses on whether social cohesion and the notion of justice are sustainable and can be upheld, at least from a European perspective. There are many theoretical and academic responses, mainly from liberals, on how to accommodate the different demands of various ethnic and religious groups and at the same time sustain a minimum of social cohesion and justice. One voice is missing and that is a conservative perspective. The purpose of this paper is to formulate a modern conservative analysis of this problem. The argument presented in this paper will, first, take its point of departure from David Hume’s notion of sympathy and how this makes social cohesion possible. Second, it will be argued that social cohesion is a prerequisite for the existence of justice, and therefore justice is a derivative of the sentiment of sympathy and of social cohesion. Third, it will be argued that the liberal neglect of the primacy of sympathy and social cohesion in favor of abstract notions of justice renders the liberal responses both incoherent and irrelevant.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Publikationsdato2011
Antal sider12
StatusUdgivet - 2011

Citer dette

@conference{a78df15e9107485192eb86fd609f4979,
title = "Justice and Social Cohesion: Some conservative perspectives",
abstract = "In the wake of recent debates on multiculturalism and value-pluralism, the pressing questions now focuses on whether social cohesion and the notion of justice are sustainable and can be upheld, at least from a European perspective. There are many theoretical and academic responses, mainly from liberals, on how to accommodate the different demands of various ethnic and religious groups and at the same time sustain a minimum of social cohesion and justice. One voice is missing and that is a conservative perspective. The purpose of this paper is to formulate a modern conservative analysis of this problem. The argument presented in this paper will, first, take its point of departure from David Hume’s notion of sympathy and how this makes social cohesion possible. Second, it will be argued that social cohesion is a prerequisite for the existence of justice, and therefore justice is a derivative of the sentiment of sympathy and of social cohesion. Third, it will be argued that the liberal neglect of the primacy of sympathy and social cohesion in favor of abstract notions of justice renders the liberal responses both incoherent and irrelevant.",
author = "Pedersen, {S{\o}ren Hviid}",
note = "Pr{\ae}senteret ved Midwestern Political Science Association",
year = "2011",
language = "English",

}

Justice and Social Cohesion: Some conservative perspectives. / Pedersen, Søren Hviid.

2011.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag uden forlag/tidsskriftPaperForskningpeer review

TY - CONF

T1 - Justice and Social Cohesion: Some conservative perspectives

AU - Pedersen, Søren Hviid

N1 - Præsenteret ved Midwestern Political Science Association

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In the wake of recent debates on multiculturalism and value-pluralism, the pressing questions now focuses on whether social cohesion and the notion of justice are sustainable and can be upheld, at least from a European perspective. There are many theoretical and academic responses, mainly from liberals, on how to accommodate the different demands of various ethnic and religious groups and at the same time sustain a minimum of social cohesion and justice. One voice is missing and that is a conservative perspective. The purpose of this paper is to formulate a modern conservative analysis of this problem. The argument presented in this paper will, first, take its point of departure from David Hume’s notion of sympathy and how this makes social cohesion possible. Second, it will be argued that social cohesion is a prerequisite for the existence of justice, and therefore justice is a derivative of the sentiment of sympathy and of social cohesion. Third, it will be argued that the liberal neglect of the primacy of sympathy and social cohesion in favor of abstract notions of justice renders the liberal responses both incoherent and irrelevant.

AB - In the wake of recent debates on multiculturalism and value-pluralism, the pressing questions now focuses on whether social cohesion and the notion of justice are sustainable and can be upheld, at least from a European perspective. There are many theoretical and academic responses, mainly from liberals, on how to accommodate the different demands of various ethnic and religious groups and at the same time sustain a minimum of social cohesion and justice. One voice is missing and that is a conservative perspective. The purpose of this paper is to formulate a modern conservative analysis of this problem. The argument presented in this paper will, first, take its point of departure from David Hume’s notion of sympathy and how this makes social cohesion possible. Second, it will be argued that social cohesion is a prerequisite for the existence of justice, and therefore justice is a derivative of the sentiment of sympathy and of social cohesion. Third, it will be argued that the liberal neglect of the primacy of sympathy and social cohesion in favor of abstract notions of justice renders the liberal responses both incoherent and irrelevant.

M3 - Paper

ER -