TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative myocardial perfusion by O-15-water PET
T2 - individualized vs. standardized vascular territories
AU - Thomassen, Anders
AU - Petersen, Henrik
AU - Johansen, Allan
AU - Braad, Poul-Erik
AU - Diederichsen, Axel Cosmus Pyndt
AU - Mickley, Hans
AU - Jensen, Lisette Okkels
AU - Gerke, Oke
AU - Simonsen, Jane Angel
AU - Thayssen, Per
AU - Høilund-Carlsen, Poul Flemming
N1 - Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2015. For permissions please email: [email protected].
PY - 2015/9
Y1 - 2015/9
N2 - AIMS: Reporting of quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) is typically performed in standard coronary territories. However, coronary anatomy and myocardial vascular territories vary among individuals, and a coronary artery may erroneously be deemed stenosed or not if territorial demarcation is incorrect. So far, the diagnostic consequences of calculating individually vs. standardly assessed MBF values have not been reported. We examined whether individual reassignment of vascular territories would improve the diagnostic accuracy of MBF with regard to the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD).METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-four patients with suspected CAD were included prospectively and underwent coronary CT-angiography and quantitative MBF assessment with O-15-water PET followed by invasive, quantitative coronary angiography, which served as reference. MBF was calculated in the vascular territories during adenosine stress according to a standardized 17-segment American Heart Association model and an individualized model, using CT-angiography to adjust the coronary territories to their feeding vessels. Individually defined territories deviated from standard territories in 52% of patients. However, MBF in the three coronary territories defined by standard and individualized models did not differ significantly, except in one patient, in whom the MBF of an individualized coronary territory deviated sufficiently as to change the test from a false positive to a true negative result in this particular territory.CONCLUSION: Disparity between standardized and individualized vascular territories was present in half of the patients, but had little clinical impact. Still, caution should be taken not always to rely on standard territories, as this may at times cause misinterpretation.
AB - AIMS: Reporting of quantitative myocardial blood flow (MBF) is typically performed in standard coronary territories. However, coronary anatomy and myocardial vascular territories vary among individuals, and a coronary artery may erroneously be deemed stenosed or not if territorial demarcation is incorrect. So far, the diagnostic consequences of calculating individually vs. standardly assessed MBF values have not been reported. We examined whether individual reassignment of vascular territories would improve the diagnostic accuracy of MBF with regard to the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD).METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-four patients with suspected CAD were included prospectively and underwent coronary CT-angiography and quantitative MBF assessment with O-15-water PET followed by invasive, quantitative coronary angiography, which served as reference. MBF was calculated in the vascular territories during adenosine stress according to a standardized 17-segment American Heart Association model and an individualized model, using CT-angiography to adjust the coronary territories to their feeding vessels. Individually defined territories deviated from standard territories in 52% of patients. However, MBF in the three coronary territories defined by standard and individualized models did not differ significantly, except in one patient, in whom the MBF of an individualized coronary territory deviated sufficiently as to change the test from a false positive to a true negative result in this particular territory.CONCLUSION: Disparity between standardized and individualized vascular territories was present in half of the patients, but had little clinical impact. Still, caution should be taken not always to rely on standard territories, as this may at times cause misinterpretation.
U2 - 10.1093/ehjci/jev111
DO - 10.1093/ehjci/jev111
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 25944051
SN - 2047-2404
VL - 16
SP - 970
EP - 976
JO - European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
JF - European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
IS - 9
ER -