PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page*, David Moher, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue E. Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W. Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Steve Mcdonald, Luke A. McguinnessLesley A. Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian A. Welch, Penny Whiting, Joanne E. Mckenzie

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstrakt

The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews. We hope that changes to the content and structure of PRISMA 2020 will facilitate uptake of the guideline and lead to more transparent, complete, and accurate reporting of systematic reviews.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummern160
TidsskriftB M J
Vol/bind372
Antal sider36
ISSN0959-8146
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 29. mar. 2021

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)).

Fingeraftryk Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater