Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions

Marc Andersen, Kristoffer Laigaard Nielbo, Uffe Schjødt, Thies Pfeiffer, Andreas Roepstorff, Jesper Sørensen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

187 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

Ouija board sessions are illustrious examples of how subjective feelings of control – the Sense of Agency (SoA) - can be manipulated in real life settings. We present findings from a field experiment at a paranormal conference, where Ouija enthusiasts were equipped with eye trackers while using the Ouija board. Our results show that participants have a significantly lower probability at visually predicting letters in a Ouija board session compared to a condition in which they are instructed to deliberately spell out words with the Ouija board planchette. Our results also show that Ouija board believers report lower SoA compared to sceptic participants. These results support previous research which claim that low sense of agency is caused by a combination of retrospective inference and an inhibition of predictive processes. Our results show that users in Ouija board sessions become increasingly better at predicting letters as responses unfold over time, and that meaningful responses from the Ouija board can only be accounted for when considering interactions that goes on at the participant pair level. These results suggest that meaningful responses from the Ouija board may be an emergent property of interacting and predicting minds that increasingly impose structure on initially random events in Ouija sessions.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPhenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)577-588
ISSN1568-7759
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jul. 2019

Fingeraftryk

Research
Ouija Board
Sense of Agency
Letters

Citer dette

Andersen, M., Nielbo, K. L., Schjødt, U., Pfeiffer, T., Roepstorff, A., & Sørensen, J. (2019). Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9585-8
Andersen, Marc ; Nielbo, Kristoffer Laigaard ; Schjødt, Uffe ; Pfeiffer, Thies ; Roepstorff, Andreas ; Sørensen, Jesper. / Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions. I: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2019 ; Bind 18, Nr. 3. s. 577-588.
@article{de213a5b234141559dd82ba1a8a4cabd,
title = "Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions",
abstract = "Ouija board sessions are illustrious examples of how subjective feelings of control – the Sense of Agency (SoA) - can be manipulated in real life settings. We present findings from a field experiment at a paranormal conference, where Ouija enthusiasts were equipped with eye trackers while using the Ouija board. Our results show that participants have a significantly lower probability at visually predicting letters in a Ouija board session compared to a condition in which they are instructed to deliberately spell out words with the Ouija board planchette. Our results also show that Ouija board believers report lower SoA compared to sceptic participants. These results support previous research which claim that low sense of agency is caused by a combination of retrospective inference and an inhibition of predictive processes. Our results show that users in Ouija board sessions become increasingly better at predicting letters as responses unfold over time, and that meaningful responses from the Ouija board can only be accounted for when considering interactions that goes on at the participant pair level. These results suggest that meaningful responses from the Ouija board may be an emergent property of interacting and predicting minds that increasingly impose structure on initially random events in Ouija sessions.",
keywords = "Eye tracking, Ouija board, Predictive minds, Religious and paranormal belief, Sense of agency",
author = "Marc Andersen and Nielbo, {Kristoffer Laigaard} and Uffe Schj{\o}dt and Thies Pfeiffer and Andreas Roepstorff and Jesper S{\o}rensen",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s11097-018-9585-8",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "577--588",
journal = "Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences",
issn = "1568-7759",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Andersen, M, Nielbo, KL, Schjødt, U, Pfeiffer, T, Roepstorff, A & Sørensen, J 2019, 'Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions', Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, bind 18, nr. 3, s. 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9585-8

Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions. / Andersen, Marc; Nielbo, Kristoffer Laigaard; Schjødt, Uffe; Pfeiffer, Thies; Roepstorff, Andreas; Sørensen, Jesper.

I: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Bind 18, Nr. 3, 07.2019, s. 577-588.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions

AU - Andersen, Marc

AU - Nielbo, Kristoffer Laigaard

AU - Schjødt, Uffe

AU - Pfeiffer, Thies

AU - Roepstorff, Andreas

AU - Sørensen, Jesper

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Ouija board sessions are illustrious examples of how subjective feelings of control – the Sense of Agency (SoA) - can be manipulated in real life settings. We present findings from a field experiment at a paranormal conference, where Ouija enthusiasts were equipped with eye trackers while using the Ouija board. Our results show that participants have a significantly lower probability at visually predicting letters in a Ouija board session compared to a condition in which they are instructed to deliberately spell out words with the Ouija board planchette. Our results also show that Ouija board believers report lower SoA compared to sceptic participants. These results support previous research which claim that low sense of agency is caused by a combination of retrospective inference and an inhibition of predictive processes. Our results show that users in Ouija board sessions become increasingly better at predicting letters as responses unfold over time, and that meaningful responses from the Ouija board can only be accounted for when considering interactions that goes on at the participant pair level. These results suggest that meaningful responses from the Ouija board may be an emergent property of interacting and predicting minds that increasingly impose structure on initially random events in Ouija sessions.

AB - Ouija board sessions are illustrious examples of how subjective feelings of control – the Sense of Agency (SoA) - can be manipulated in real life settings. We present findings from a field experiment at a paranormal conference, where Ouija enthusiasts were equipped with eye trackers while using the Ouija board. Our results show that participants have a significantly lower probability at visually predicting letters in a Ouija board session compared to a condition in which they are instructed to deliberately spell out words with the Ouija board planchette. Our results also show that Ouija board believers report lower SoA compared to sceptic participants. These results support previous research which claim that low sense of agency is caused by a combination of retrospective inference and an inhibition of predictive processes. Our results show that users in Ouija board sessions become increasingly better at predicting letters as responses unfold over time, and that meaningful responses from the Ouija board can only be accounted for when considering interactions that goes on at the participant pair level. These results suggest that meaningful responses from the Ouija board may be an emergent property of interacting and predicting minds that increasingly impose structure on initially random events in Ouija sessions.

KW - Eye tracking

KW - Ouija board

KW - Predictive minds

KW - Religious and paranormal belief

KW - Sense of agency

U2 - 10.1007/s11097-018-9585-8

DO - 10.1007/s11097-018-9585-8

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 577

EP - 588

JO - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

JF - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences

SN - 1568-7759

IS - 3

ER -

Andersen M, Nielbo KL, Schjødt U, Pfeiffer T, Roepstorff A, Sørensen J. Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. 2019 jul;18(3):577-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9585-8