Patient-physician conversations about life-sustaining treatment: Treatment preferences and participant assessments

Lone Doris Tuesen*, Hans Henrik Bülow, Anne Sophie Ågård, Sverre Maintz Strøm, Erik Fromme, Hanne Irene Jensen

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective In 2019, the Danish parliament issued legislation requiring Danish physicians to clarify and honor seriously ill patients' treatment preferences. The American POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) document could be a valuable model for this process. The aim of the study was to examine patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatment and participant assessment of a Danish POLST form. Methods The study is a prospective intervention based on a pilot-tested Danish POLST form. Participant assessments were examined using questionnaire surveys. Patients with serious illness and/or frailty from seven hospital wards, two general practitioners, and four nursing homes were included. The patients and their physicians completed the POLST form based on a process of shared decision-making. Results A total of 95 patients (aged 41-95) participated. Hereof, 88% declined cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 83% preferred limited medical interventions or comfort care, and 74% did not require artificial nutrition. The preferences were similar within age groups, genders, and locations, but with a tendency toward younger patients being more in favor of full treatment and nursing home residents being more in favor of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Questionnaire response rates were 69% (66/95) for patients, 79% (22/28) for physicians, and 31% (9/29) for nurses. Hereof, the majority of patients, physicians, and nurses found that the POLST form was usable for conversations and decision-making about life-sustaining treatment to either a high or very high degree. Significance of results The majority of seriously ill patients did not want a resuscitation attempt and opted for selected treatments. The majority of participants found that the Danish POLST was usable for conversations and decisions about life-sustaining treatment to either a high or a very high degree, and that the POLST form facilitated an opportunity to openly discuss life-sustaining treatment.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPalliative & Supportive Care
Vol/bind21
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)20-26
ISSN1478-9515
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 16. feb. 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
The study was supported by Novo Nordic (grant number: NNF16OC0023610), The Development and Research Fund, Danish Regions and the Health Cartel (15.2.2017), and The Region of Southern Denmark (grant number: J.nr.: 17/15128).

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Patient-physician conversations about life-sustaining treatment: Treatment preferences and participant assessments'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater