Spring til hovednavigation Spring til søgning Spring til hovedindhold

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Probability of bystander defibrillation relative to distance to nearest automated external defibrillator

  • Kathrine B. Sondergaard*
  • , Steen Moller Hansen
  • , Jannik L. Pallisgaard
  • , Thomas Alexander Gerds
  • , Mads Wissenberg
  • , Lena Karlsson
  • , Freddy K. Lippert
  • , Gunnar H. Gislason
  • , Christian Torp-Pedersen
  • , Fredrik Folke
  • *Kontaktforfatter
    • Københavns Universitetshospital
    • Aalborg Universitet
    • Københavns Universitet
    • Præhospitalt Beredskab Region Hovedstaden

    Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

    417 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Aims: Despite wide dissemination of automated external defibrillators (AEDs), bystander defibrillation rates remain low. We aimed to investigate how route distance to the nearest accessible AED was associated with probability of bystander defibrillation in public and residential locations. Methods: We used data from the nationwide Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and the Danish AED Network to identify out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and route distances to nearest accessible registered AED during 2008–2013. The association between route distance and bystander defibrillation was described using restricted cubic spline logistic regression. Results: We included 6971 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases. The proportion of arrests according to distance in meters (≤100, 101–200, >200) to the nearest accessible AED was: 4.6% (n = 320), 5.3% (n = 370), and 90.1% (n = 6281), respectively. For cardiac arrests in public locations, the probability of bystander defibrillation at 0, 100 and 200 m from the nearest AED was 35.7% (95% confidence interval 28.0%–43.5%), 21.3% (95% confidence interval 17.4%–25.2%), and 13.7% (95% confidence interval 10.1%–16.8%), respectively. The corresponding numbers for cardiac arrests in residential locations were 7.0% (95% confidence interval −2.1%–16.1%), 1.5% (95% confidence interval 0.002%–2.8%), and 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.0005%–1.7%), respectively. Conclusions: In public locations, the probability of bystander defibrillation decreased rapidly within the first 100 m route distance from cardiac arrest to nearest accessible AED whereas the probability of bystander defibrillation was low for all distances in residential areas.

    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftResuscitation
    Vol/bind124
    Sider (fra-til)138-144
    ISSN0300-9572
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 2018

    Finansiering

    This work was supported by the Danish foundation TrygFonden that had no influence on study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the paper for publication. TrygFonden also supports the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and the Danish AED network with no commercial interest in the field of cardiac arrest. Dr. Gislason is supported by an independent clinical research scholarship from the Novo Nordisk Foundation. We thank Viamap APS (www.viamap.net) for performing and providing technical assistance in the geocoding. Additionally, we thank the Danish Emergency Medical Services personnel who completed the case report forms for the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry.

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Probability of bystander defibrillation relative to distance to nearest automated external defibrillator'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater