Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R & D

Maximilian Von Zedtwitz*

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Post-project reviews are one opportunity to systematically improve performance in subsequent projects. However, a survey reveals that only one out of five R & D projects receives a post-project review. Post-project reviews - if they take place - are typically constrained by lack of time and attention as well as lack of personal interest and ability. They focus mostly on technical output and bureaucratic measurements; process-related factors such as project management are rarely discussed. In this paper we review the role of post-project meetings as a tool to improve organizational learning at the group level. Based on 27 in-depth interviews with R & D managers carried out between 1997 and 2001, we categorize four classes of learning impediments. These difficulties are not easily resolved, as is illustrated by examples from Hewlett-Packard, DaimlerChrysler, SAP, Unisys, the US Army, and others. We propose a five-level post-project review capability maturity model, identifying some of the key capabilities that need to be in place in order to advance to the next process maturity level. Most companies reside on the first or second maturity level. Our conclusion is that many companies give away great potential for competence building by neglecting post-project reviews as a tool for systematic interproject learning.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftR and D Management
Vol/bind32
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)255-268
Antal sider14
ISSN0033-6807
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1. jun. 2002
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

Project management
Organizational learning
Industry
Managers
Maturity level
Factors
Capability maturity model
Impediments
Competence building
In-depth interviews

Citer dette

@article{7c1a015a74d043a4a2df5f84d409fd06,
title = "Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R & D",
abstract = "Post-project reviews are one opportunity to systematically improve performance in subsequent projects. However, a survey reveals that only one out of five R & D projects receives a post-project review. Post-project reviews - if they take place - are typically constrained by lack of time and attention as well as lack of personal interest and ability. They focus mostly on technical output and bureaucratic measurements; process-related factors such as project management are rarely discussed. In this paper we review the role of post-project meetings as a tool to improve organizational learning at the group level. Based on 27 in-depth interviews with R & D managers carried out between 1997 and 2001, we categorize four classes of learning impediments. These difficulties are not easily resolved, as is illustrated by examples from Hewlett-Packard, DaimlerChrysler, SAP, Unisys, the US Army, and others. We propose a five-level post-project review capability maturity model, identifying some of the key capabilities that need to be in place in order to advance to the next process maturity level. Most companies reside on the first or second maturity level. Our conclusion is that many companies give away great potential for competence building by neglecting post-project reviews as a tool for systematic interproject learning.",
author = "{Von Zedtwitz}, Maximilian",
year = "2002",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1467-9310.00258",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "255--268",
journal = "R & D Management",
issn = "0033-6807",
publisher = "Wiley Online",
number = "3",

}

Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R & D. / Von Zedtwitz, Maximilian.

I: R and D Management, Bind 32, Nr. 3, 01.06.2002, s. 255-268.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R & D

AU - Von Zedtwitz, Maximilian

PY - 2002/6/1

Y1 - 2002/6/1

N2 - Post-project reviews are one opportunity to systematically improve performance in subsequent projects. However, a survey reveals that only one out of five R & D projects receives a post-project review. Post-project reviews - if they take place - are typically constrained by lack of time and attention as well as lack of personal interest and ability. They focus mostly on technical output and bureaucratic measurements; process-related factors such as project management are rarely discussed. In this paper we review the role of post-project meetings as a tool to improve organizational learning at the group level. Based on 27 in-depth interviews with R & D managers carried out between 1997 and 2001, we categorize four classes of learning impediments. These difficulties are not easily resolved, as is illustrated by examples from Hewlett-Packard, DaimlerChrysler, SAP, Unisys, the US Army, and others. We propose a five-level post-project review capability maturity model, identifying some of the key capabilities that need to be in place in order to advance to the next process maturity level. Most companies reside on the first or second maturity level. Our conclusion is that many companies give away great potential for competence building by neglecting post-project reviews as a tool for systematic interproject learning.

AB - Post-project reviews are one opportunity to systematically improve performance in subsequent projects. However, a survey reveals that only one out of five R & D projects receives a post-project review. Post-project reviews - if they take place - are typically constrained by lack of time and attention as well as lack of personal interest and ability. They focus mostly on technical output and bureaucratic measurements; process-related factors such as project management are rarely discussed. In this paper we review the role of post-project meetings as a tool to improve organizational learning at the group level. Based on 27 in-depth interviews with R & D managers carried out between 1997 and 2001, we categorize four classes of learning impediments. These difficulties are not easily resolved, as is illustrated by examples from Hewlett-Packard, DaimlerChrysler, SAP, Unisys, the US Army, and others. We propose a five-level post-project review capability maturity model, identifying some of the key capabilities that need to be in place in order to advance to the next process maturity level. Most companies reside on the first or second maturity level. Our conclusion is that many companies give away great potential for competence building by neglecting post-project reviews as a tool for systematic interproject learning.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-9310.00258

DO - 10.1111/1467-9310.00258

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 255

EP - 268

JO - R & D Management

JF - R & D Management

SN - 0033-6807

IS - 3

ER -