TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal Predilatation Treatment Before Implantation of a Magmaris Bioresorbable Scaffold in Coronary Artery Stenosis
T2 - The OPTIMIS Trial
AU - Hansen, Kirstine Nørregaard
AU - Trøan, Jens
AU - Maehara, Akiko
AU - Noori, Manijeh
AU - Hougaard, Mikkel
AU - Ellert-Gregersen, Julia
AU - Veien, Karsten Tange
AU - Junker, Anders
AU - Hansen, Henrik Steen
AU - Lassen, Jens Flensted
AU - Jensen, Lisette Okkels
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed to overcome limitations related to late stent failures of drug-eluting stents, but lumen reductions over time after implantation of BRS have been reported. This study aimed to investigate if lesion preparation with a scoring balloon compared with a standard noncompliant balloon minimizes lumen reduction after implantation of a Magmaris BRS assessed with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with stable angina were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to lesion preparation with a scoring balloon versus a standard noncompliant balloon before implantation of a Magmaris BRS. The primary end point was minimal lumen area at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Following Magmaris BRS implantation, minimal lumen area (6.4±1.6 versus 6.3±1.5 mm2; P=0.65), mean scaffold area (7.8±1.5 versus 7.5±1.7 mm2; P=0.37), and mean lumen area (8.0±1.6 versus 7.7±2.1 mm2; P=0.41) did not differ significantly in patients with lesions prepared with scoring versus standard noncompliant balloon, respectively. Six-month angiographic follow-up with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound was available in 74 patients. The primary end point, 6-month minimal lumen area, was significantly larger in lesions prepared with a scoring balloon compared with a standard noncompliant balloon (4.7±1.4 versus 3.9±1.9 mm2; P=0.04), whereas mean lumen area (7.2±1.4 versus 6.8±2.2 mm2; P=0.35) did not differ significantly. Intravascular ultrasound findings showed no difference in mean vessel area at the lesion site from baseline to follow-up in the scoring balloon group (16.8±2.9 versus 17.0±3.6 mm2; P=0.62), whereas mean vessel area (17.1±4.4 versus 15.7±4.9 mm2; P<0.001) was smaller in lesions prepared with a standard noncompliant balloon due to negative remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion preparation with a scoring balloon before implantation of a Magmaris BRS resulted in a significantly larger minimal lumen area after 6 months due to less negative remodeling compared with lesion preparation with a standard noncompliant balloon. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04666584.
AB - BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were developed to overcome limitations related to late stent failures of drug-eluting stents, but lumen reductions over time after implantation of BRS have been reported. This study aimed to investigate if lesion preparation with a scoring balloon compared with a standard noncompliant balloon minimizes lumen reduction after implantation of a Magmaris BRS assessed with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with stable angina were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to lesion preparation with a scoring balloon versus a standard noncompliant balloon before implantation of a Magmaris BRS. The primary end point was minimal lumen area at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Following Magmaris BRS implantation, minimal lumen area (6.4±1.6 versus 6.3±1.5 mm2; P=0.65), mean scaffold area (7.8±1.5 versus 7.5±1.7 mm2; P=0.37), and mean lumen area (8.0±1.6 versus 7.7±2.1 mm2; P=0.41) did not differ significantly in patients with lesions prepared with scoring versus standard noncompliant balloon, respectively. Six-month angiographic follow-up with optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound was available in 74 patients. The primary end point, 6-month minimal lumen area, was significantly larger in lesions prepared with a scoring balloon compared with a standard noncompliant balloon (4.7±1.4 versus 3.9±1.9 mm2; P=0.04), whereas mean lumen area (7.2±1.4 versus 6.8±2.2 mm2; P=0.35) did not differ significantly. Intravascular ultrasound findings showed no difference in mean vessel area at the lesion site from baseline to follow-up in the scoring balloon group (16.8±2.9 versus 17.0±3.6 mm2; P=0.62), whereas mean vessel area (17.1±4.4 versus 15.7±4.9 mm2; P<0.001) was smaller in lesions prepared with a standard noncompliant balloon due to negative remodeling. CONCLUSIONS: Lesion preparation with a scoring balloon before implantation of a Magmaris BRS resulted in a significantly larger minimal lumen area after 6 months due to less negative remodeling compared with lesion preparation with a standard noncompliant balloon. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04666584.
KW - absorbable implants
KW - angina, stable
KW - drug-eluting stents
KW - tomography, optical coherence
KW - ultrasonography, interventional
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Tomography, Optical Coherence
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Ultrasonography, Interventional
KW - Male
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Cardiac Catheters
KW - Prosthesis Design
KW - Absorbable Implants
KW - Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging
KW - Coronary Angiography
KW - Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/instrumentation
KW - Time Factors
KW - Angina, Stable/therapy
KW - Female
KW - Aged
KW - Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging
U2 - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014665
DO - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014665
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39836741
AN - SCOPUS:85216524279
SN - 1941-7640
VL - 18
JO - Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
JF - Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
IS - 1
M1 - e014665
ER -