Opportunities and costs for preventing vertebrate extinctions

Dalia Amor Conde, Fernando Colchero, Burak Güneralp, Markus Gusset, Ben Skolnik, Michael Parr, Onnie Byers, Kevin Johnson, Glyn Young, Nate Flesness, Hugh Possingham, John Fa

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Despite an increase in policy and management responses to the global biodiversity crisis, implementation of the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets still shows insufficient progress [1] . These targets, strategic goals defined by the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), address major causes of biodiversity loss in part by establishing protected areas (Target 11) and preventing species extinctions (Target 12). To achieve this, increased interventions will be required for a large number of sites and species. The Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) [2] , a consortium of conservation-oriented organisations that aims to protect Critically Endangered and Endangered species restricted to single sites, has identified 920 species of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, conifers and reef-building corals in 588 ‘trigger’ sites [3] . These are arguably the most irreplaceable category of important biodiversity conservation sites. Protected area coverage of AZE sites is a key indicator of progress towards Target 11 [1] . Moreover, effective conservation of AZE sites is essential to achieve Target 12, as the loss of any of these sites would certainly result in the global extinction of at least one species [2] . However, averting human-induced species extinctions within AZE sites requires enhanced planning tools to increase the chances of success [3] . Here, we assess the potential for ensuring the long-term conservation of AZE vertebrate species (157 mammals, 165 birds, 17 reptiles and 502 amphibians) by calculating a conservation opportunity index (COI) for each species. The COI encompasses a set of measurable indicators that quantify the possibility of achieving successful conservation of a species in its natural habitat (COIh) and by establishing insurance populations in zoos (COIc).
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCurrent Biology
Vol/bind25
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)219-221
Antal sider3
ISSN0960-9822
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 16. mar. 2015

Fingeraftryk

Biodiversity
Vertebrates
Conservation
extinction
vertebrates
Reptiles
biodiversity
Costs
Mammals
Birds
Coral Reefs
Coniferophyta
Endangered Species
United Nations
reptiles
amphibians
conservation areas
Ecosystem
mammals
Reefs

Citer dette

Conde, Dalia Amor ; Colchero, Fernando ; Güneralp, Burak ; Gusset, Markus ; Skolnik, Ben ; Parr, Michael ; Byers, Onnie ; Johnson, Kevin ; Young, Glyn ; Flesness, Nate ; Possingham, Hugh ; Fa, John. / Opportunities and costs for preventing vertebrate extinctions. I: Current Biology. 2015 ; Bind 25, Nr. 6. s. 219-221.
@article{518d549f61444b32a42e6f7596d6c32c,
title = "Opportunities and costs for preventing vertebrate extinctions",
abstract = "Despite an increase in policy and management responses to the global biodiversity crisis, implementation of the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets still shows insufficient progress [1] . These targets, strategic goals defined by the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), address major causes of biodiversity loss in part by establishing protected areas (Target 11) and preventing species extinctions (Target 12). To achieve this, increased interventions will be required for a large number of sites and species. The Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) [2] , a consortium of conservation-oriented organisations that aims to protect Critically Endangered and Endangered species restricted to single sites, has identified 920 species of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, conifers and reef-building corals in 588 ‘trigger’ sites [3] . These are arguably the most irreplaceable category of important biodiversity conservation sites. Protected area coverage of AZE sites is a key indicator of progress towards Target 11 [1] . Moreover, effective conservation of AZE sites is essential to achieve Target 12, as the loss of any of these sites would certainly result in the global extinction of at least one species [2] . However, averting human-induced species extinctions within AZE sites requires enhanced planning tools to increase the chances of success [3] . Here, we assess the potential for ensuring the long-term conservation of AZE vertebrate species (157 mammals, 165 birds, 17 reptiles and 502 amphibians) by calculating a conservation opportunity index (COI) for each species. The COI encompasses a set of measurable indicators that quantify the possibility of achieving successful conservation of a species in its natural habitat (COIh) and by establishing insurance populations in zoos (COIc).",
author = "Conde, {Dalia Amor} and Fernando Colchero and Burak G{\"u}neralp and Markus Gusset and Ben Skolnik and Michael Parr and Onnie Byers and Kevin Johnson and Glyn Young and Nate Flesness and Hugh Possingham and John Fa",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.048",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "219--221",
journal = "Current Biology",
issn = "0960-9822",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "6",

}

Conde, DA, Colchero, F, Güneralp, B, Gusset, M, Skolnik, B, Parr, M, Byers, O, Johnson, K, Young, G, Flesness, N, Possingham, H & Fa, J 2015, 'Opportunities and costs for preventing vertebrate extinctions', Current Biology, bind 25, nr. 6, s. 219-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.048

Opportunities and costs for preventing vertebrate extinctions. / Conde, Dalia Amor; Colchero, Fernando; Güneralp, Burak; Gusset, Markus; Skolnik, Ben; Parr, Michael; Byers, Onnie; Johnson, Kevin; Young, Glyn; Flesness, Nate; Possingham, Hugh; Fa, John.

I: Current Biology, Bind 25, Nr. 6, 16.03.2015, s. 219-221.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opportunities and costs for preventing vertebrate extinctions

AU - Conde, Dalia Amor

AU - Colchero, Fernando

AU - Güneralp, Burak

AU - Gusset, Markus

AU - Skolnik, Ben

AU - Parr, Michael

AU - Byers, Onnie

AU - Johnson, Kevin

AU - Young, Glyn

AU - Flesness, Nate

AU - Possingham, Hugh

AU - Fa, John

PY - 2015/3/16

Y1 - 2015/3/16

N2 - Despite an increase in policy and management responses to the global biodiversity crisis, implementation of the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets still shows insufficient progress [1] . These targets, strategic goals defined by the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), address major causes of biodiversity loss in part by establishing protected areas (Target 11) and preventing species extinctions (Target 12). To achieve this, increased interventions will be required for a large number of sites and species. The Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) [2] , a consortium of conservation-oriented organisations that aims to protect Critically Endangered and Endangered species restricted to single sites, has identified 920 species of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, conifers and reef-building corals in 588 ‘trigger’ sites [3] . These are arguably the most irreplaceable category of important biodiversity conservation sites. Protected area coverage of AZE sites is a key indicator of progress towards Target 11 [1] . Moreover, effective conservation of AZE sites is essential to achieve Target 12, as the loss of any of these sites would certainly result in the global extinction of at least one species [2] . However, averting human-induced species extinctions within AZE sites requires enhanced planning tools to increase the chances of success [3] . Here, we assess the potential for ensuring the long-term conservation of AZE vertebrate species (157 mammals, 165 birds, 17 reptiles and 502 amphibians) by calculating a conservation opportunity index (COI) for each species. The COI encompasses a set of measurable indicators that quantify the possibility of achieving successful conservation of a species in its natural habitat (COIh) and by establishing insurance populations in zoos (COIc).

AB - Despite an increase in policy and management responses to the global biodiversity crisis, implementation of the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets still shows insufficient progress [1] . These targets, strategic goals defined by the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), address major causes of biodiversity loss in part by establishing protected areas (Target 11) and preventing species extinctions (Target 12). To achieve this, increased interventions will be required for a large number of sites and species. The Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) [2] , a consortium of conservation-oriented organisations that aims to protect Critically Endangered and Endangered species restricted to single sites, has identified 920 species of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, conifers and reef-building corals in 588 ‘trigger’ sites [3] . These are arguably the most irreplaceable category of important biodiversity conservation sites. Protected area coverage of AZE sites is a key indicator of progress towards Target 11 [1] . Moreover, effective conservation of AZE sites is essential to achieve Target 12, as the loss of any of these sites would certainly result in the global extinction of at least one species [2] . However, averting human-induced species extinctions within AZE sites requires enhanced planning tools to increase the chances of success [3] . Here, we assess the potential for ensuring the long-term conservation of AZE vertebrate species (157 mammals, 165 birds, 17 reptiles and 502 amphibians) by calculating a conservation opportunity index (COI) for each species. The COI encompasses a set of measurable indicators that quantify the possibility of achieving successful conservation of a species in its natural habitat (COIh) and by establishing insurance populations in zoos (COIc).

U2 - 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.048

DO - 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.048

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25784036

VL - 25

SP - 219

EP - 221

JO - Current Biology

JF - Current Biology

SN - 0960-9822

IS - 6

ER -