TY - GEN
T1 - Online Dominating Set
AU - Boyar, Joan
AU - Eidenbenz, Stephen J.
AU - Favrholdt, Lene Monrad
AU - Kotrbcik, Michal
AU - Larsen, Kim Skak
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This paper is devoted to the online dominating set problem and its variants on trees, bipartite, bounded-degree, planar, and general graphs, distinguishing between connected and not necessarily connected graphs. We believe this paper represents the first systematic study of the effect of two limitations of online algorithms: making irrevocable decisions while not knowing the future, and being incremental, i.e., having to maintain solutions to all prefixes of the input. This is quantified through competitive analyses of online algorithms against two optimal algorithms, both knowing the entire input, but only one having to be incremental. We also consider the competitive ratio of the weaker of the two optimal algorithms against the other. In most cases, we obtain tight bounds on the competitive ratios. Our results show that requiring the graphs to be presented in a connected fashion allows the online algorithms to obtain provably better solutions. Furthermore, we get detailed information regarding the significance of the necessary requirement that online algorithms be incremental. In some cases, having to be incremental fully accounts for the online algorithm's disadvantage.
AB - This paper is devoted to the online dominating set problem and its variants on trees, bipartite, bounded-degree, planar, and general graphs, distinguishing between connected and not necessarily connected graphs. We believe this paper represents the first systematic study of the effect of two limitations of online algorithms: making irrevocable decisions while not knowing the future, and being incremental, i.e., having to maintain solutions to all prefixes of the input. This is quantified through competitive analyses of online algorithms against two optimal algorithms, both knowing the entire input, but only one having to be incremental. We also consider the competitive ratio of the weaker of the two optimal algorithms against the other. In most cases, we obtain tight bounds on the competitive ratios. Our results show that requiring the graphs to be presented in a connected fashion allows the online algorithms to obtain provably better solutions. Furthermore, we get detailed information regarding the significance of the necessary requirement that online algorithms be incremental. In some cases, having to be incremental fully accounts for the online algorithm's disadvantage.
KW - online algorithms
KW - dominating set
KW - irrevocability
KW - Competitive analysis
KW - Connected graphs
KW - Dominating set
KW - Graph classes
KW - Online algorithms
U2 - 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2016.21
DO - 10.4230/LIPIcs.SWAT.2016.21
M3 - Article in proceedings
T3 - Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics
SP - 1
EP - 15
BT - 15th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory, SWAT 2016
A2 - Pagh, Rasmus
PB - Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik
T2 - 15th Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory
Y2 - 22 June 2016 through 24 June 2016
ER -