Modeling human syllogistic reasoning: The role of "No valid conclusion"

Nicolas Riesterer, Daniel Brandt, Hannah Dames, Marco Ragni

Publikation: Kapitel i bog/rapport/konference-proceedingKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningpeer review

Abstrakt

"No Valid Conclusion" (NVC) is one of the most frequently selected responses in syllogistic reasoning experiments and corresponds to the logically correct conclusion for 58\% of the syllogistic problem domain. Still, NVC is often neglected in computational models or just treated as a byproduct of the underlying inferential mechanisms such as a last resort when the search for alternatives is exhausted. We illustrate that NVC represents a major shortcoming of current models for human syllogistic reasoning. By introducing heuristic rules, we demonstrate that slight extensions of the existing models result in substantial improvements of their predictive performances. Our results illustrate the need for better NVC handling in cognitive modeling and provide directions for modelers on how to integrate it into their approaches.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelProceedings of the 41th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
RedaktørerAshok Goel, Colleen Seifert, Christian Freksa
ForlagCognitive Science Society
Publikationsdato2019
Sider953-959
ISBN (Trykt)9781510891555
StatusUdgivet - 2019
Udgivet eksterntJa
Begivenhed41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: Creativity + Cognition + Computation - Montreal, Canada
Varighed: 24. jul. 201927. jul. 2019

Konference

Konference41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
LandCanada
ByMontreal
Periode24/07/201927/07/2019

Fingeraftryk Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Modeling human syllogistic reasoning: The role of "No valid conclusion"'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater