Methods proposed for monitoring the implementation of evidence-based research: a cross-sectional study

Livia Puljak*, Małgorzata M. Bala, Joanna Zając, Tomislav Meštrović, Sandra Buttigieg, Mary Yanakoulia, Matthias Briel, Carole Lunny, Wiktoria Lesniak, Tina Poklepović Peričić, Pablo Alonso-Coello, Mike Clarke, Benjamin Djulbegovic, Gerald Gartlehner, Konstantinos Giannakou, Anne Marie Glenny, Claire Glenton, Gordon Guyatt, Lars G. Hemkens, John P.A. IoannidisRoman Jaeschke, Karsten Juhl Jørgensen, Carolina Castro Martins-Pfeifer, Ana Marušić, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Jose Francisco Meneses Echavez, David Moher, Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit, Matthew J. Page, Giordano Pérez-Gaxiola, Karen A. Robinson, Georgia Salanti, Ian J. Saldanha, Jelena Savović, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Peter Tugwell, Joost van Hoof, Dawid Pieper


Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review


Objectives: Evidence-based research (EBR) is the systematic and transparent use of prior research to inform a new study so that it answers questions that matter in a valid, efficient, and accessible manner. This study surveyed experts about existing (e.g., citation analysis) and new methods for monitoring EBR and collected ideas about implementing these methods. Study Design and Setting: We conducted a cross-sectional study via an online survey between November 2022 and March 2023. Participants were experts from the fields of evidence synthesis and research methodology in health research. Open-ended questions were coded by recurring themes; descriptive statistics were used for quantitative questions. Results: Twenty-eight expert participants suggested that citation analysis should be supplemented with content evaluation (not just what is cited but also in which context), content expert involvement, and assessment of the quality of cited systematic reviews. They also suggested that citation analysis could be facilitated with automation tools. They emphasized that EBR monitoring should be conducted by ethics committees and funding bodies before the research starts. Challenges identified for EBR implementation monitoring were resource constraints and clarity on responsibility for EBR monitoring. Conclusion: Ideas proposed in this study for monitoring the implementation of EBR can be used to refine methods and define responsibility but should be further explored in terms of feasibility and acceptability. Different methods may be needed to determine if the use of EBR is improving over time.

TidsskriftJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2024


Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Methods proposed for monitoring the implementation of evidence-based research: a cross-sectional study'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.