@inbook{38ef447679884822ab1db01e41c4d2b1,
title = "Measures of Decision Aid Quality Are Preference-Sensitive and Interest-Conflicted - 2: Empirical Measures",
abstract = "Empirical measures of 'decision aid quality', like normative ones, are of a formative construct and therefore embody interest-conflicted preferences in their criteria selection and weighting. The preferences of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards consortium distinguish the quality of the decision-making process and the quality of the choice that is made '(i.e., decision quality)'. The Decision Conflict Scale features heavily in their profile measure of the former and Decision Quality Instruments (DQIs), have been developed by members of the consortium to measure the latter. We confirm that both of these, and other components, like the higher-level measures, are preference-sensitive and interest-conflicted. Non-financial interest-conflicted preferences are endemic in healthcare research, policy-making, and practice. That they are inevitable means the main problem lies in the denial of this and attitude to and behaviour towards alternatives, equally interest-conflicted.",
keywords = "conflict of interest, Decision aid, Decision Conflict Scale, Decision Quality Instrument, empirical evaluation, IPDAS",
author = "Jack Dowie and Kaltoft, \{Mette Kjer\} and Rajput, \{Vije Kumar\}",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "23",
doi = "10.3233/SHTI200693",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-64368-144-3",
volume = "275",
series = "Studies in Health Technology and Informatics",
publisher = "IOS Press",
pages = "52--56",
editor = "Alpo V{\"a}rri and Jaime Delgado and Parisis Gallos and Maria H{\"a}gglund and Kristiina H{\"a}yrinen and Ulla-Mari Kinnunen and Pape-Haugaard, \{Louise B.\} and Laura-Marie Peltonen and Philip Scott",
booktitle = "Integrated Citizen Centered Digital Health and Social Care",
address = "Netherlands",
}