Mapping International Co-authorship Networks in Border Studies (1986–2018)

Olivier Walther, Martin Klatt, Freerk Boedeltje

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Border studies have become increasingly global over the past two decades. Yet, a network analysis of the articles published in the Journal of Borderlands Studies from 1986 to 2018 shows that less than half of them have one or more coauthors. Unlike in other scientific disciplines, where a growth of co-publications is observed, this proportion has not really changed over the last decade. Our paper also shows that major divisions can be found within border studies, which is no small paradox for a science supposedly cross-border by nature. Despite the overall global increase in scientific connectivity, internationally co-authored papers are still an exception in our field and scholars have a strong preference for publishing within their own country. Instead of a fully integrated community, they form a fragmented network whose main components are mainly located in the United States. Interviews with border experts reveal that various obstacles contribute to the current fragmentation of border studies. In addition to being separated by geographical distance and, sometimes, by actual walls, border scholars must also able to overcome the cognitive, social, organizational, and institutional distance that separate them.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Borderlands Studies
ISSN0886-5655
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2019

Fingeraftryk

scientific discipline
network analysis
fragmentation
expert
interview
science
community
border
connectivity

Citer dette

@article{684aa1c181ee4520b8b1686eaeae674d,
title = "Mapping International Co-authorship Networks in Border Studies (1986–2018)",
abstract = "Border studies have become increasingly global over the past two decades. Yet, a network analysis of the articles published in the Journal of Borderlands Studies from 1986 to 2018 shows that less than half of them have one or more coauthors. Unlike in other scientific disciplines, where a growth of co-publications is observed, this proportion has not really changed over the last decade. Our paper also shows that major divisions can be found within border studies, which is no small paradox for a science supposedly cross-border by nature. Despite the overall global increase in scientific connectivity, internationally co-authored papers are still an exception in our field and scholars have a strong preference for publishing within their own country. Instead of a fully integrated community, they form a fragmented network whose main components are mainly located in the United States. Interviews with border experts reveal that various obstacles contribute to the current fragmentation of border studies. In addition to being separated by geographical distance and, sometimes, by actual walls, border scholars must also able to overcome the cognitive, social, organizational, and institutional distance that separate them.",
keywords = "border studies, coauthorship networks, social network analysis, sociometrics, borders",
author = "Olivier Walther and Martin Klatt and Freerk Boedeltje",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1080/08865655.2019.1685402",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Borderlands Studies",
issn = "0886-5655",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

Mapping International Co-authorship Networks in Border Studies (1986–2018). / Walther, Olivier; Klatt, Martin; Boedeltje, Freerk.

I: Journal of Borderlands Studies, 11.2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping International Co-authorship Networks in Border Studies (1986–2018)

AU - Walther, Olivier

AU - Klatt, Martin

AU - Boedeltje, Freerk

PY - 2019/11

Y1 - 2019/11

N2 - Border studies have become increasingly global over the past two decades. Yet, a network analysis of the articles published in the Journal of Borderlands Studies from 1986 to 2018 shows that less than half of them have one or more coauthors. Unlike in other scientific disciplines, where a growth of co-publications is observed, this proportion has not really changed over the last decade. Our paper also shows that major divisions can be found within border studies, which is no small paradox for a science supposedly cross-border by nature. Despite the overall global increase in scientific connectivity, internationally co-authored papers are still an exception in our field and scholars have a strong preference for publishing within their own country. Instead of a fully integrated community, they form a fragmented network whose main components are mainly located in the United States. Interviews with border experts reveal that various obstacles contribute to the current fragmentation of border studies. In addition to being separated by geographical distance and, sometimes, by actual walls, border scholars must also able to overcome the cognitive, social, organizational, and institutional distance that separate them.

AB - Border studies have become increasingly global over the past two decades. Yet, a network analysis of the articles published in the Journal of Borderlands Studies from 1986 to 2018 shows that less than half of them have one or more coauthors. Unlike in other scientific disciplines, where a growth of co-publications is observed, this proportion has not really changed over the last decade. Our paper also shows that major divisions can be found within border studies, which is no small paradox for a science supposedly cross-border by nature. Despite the overall global increase in scientific connectivity, internationally co-authored papers are still an exception in our field and scholars have a strong preference for publishing within their own country. Instead of a fully integrated community, they form a fragmented network whose main components are mainly located in the United States. Interviews with border experts reveal that various obstacles contribute to the current fragmentation of border studies. In addition to being separated by geographical distance and, sometimes, by actual walls, border scholars must also able to overcome the cognitive, social, organizational, and institutional distance that separate them.

KW - border studies

KW - coauthorship networks

KW - social network analysis

KW - sociometrics

KW - borders

U2 - 10.1080/08865655.2019.1685402

DO - 10.1080/08865655.2019.1685402

M3 - Journal article

JO - Journal of Borderlands Studies

JF - Journal of Borderlands Studies

SN - 0886-5655

ER -