Management by Objectives and Results in the Nordic Countries

Continuity and Change, Differences and Similarities

Bidragets oversatte titel: Mål- og resultatstyring i de nordiske lande: Kontinuitet og forandring, forskelle og ligheder

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In order to identify continuity or change, this paper analyzes the development processes of the management by objectives and results (MBOR) discourse over time in the central governments of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. It shows that MBOR has been marked by continuity since its introduction in the 1980s, and has become a central element in the steering and management of agencies in central government in all three countries. Nevertheless, gradual changes that have altered the direction of the MBOR discourse over time can also be identified. The direction changes from autonomy and a simple MBOR system in the early years toward more control and a more comprehensive system in the 1990s, and back again toward more autonomy and a less comprehensive MBOR system in recent years. The development processes in the three countries are characterized by some differences, but seem also to share numerous similarities. Explanations of these differences and similarities are discussed in the final section of the paper.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer8
TidsskriftPublic Performance and Management Review
Vol/bind38
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)542-569
Antal sider18
ISSN1530-9576
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2015
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

management approach
continuity
autonomy
discourse
Denmark
Norway
Sweden
Continuity
Management by objectives
Nordic countries
management

Citer dette

@article{7e89e466725542de990b0a0d9d07ed36,
title = "Management by Objectives and Results in the Nordic Countries: Continuity and Change, Differences and Similarities",
abstract = "In order to identify continuity or change, this paper analyzes the development processes of the management by objectives and results (MBOR) discourse over time in the central governments of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. It shows that MBOR has been marked by continuity since its introduction in the 1980s, and has become a central element in the steering and management of agencies in central government in all three countries. Nevertheless, gradual changes that have altered the direction of the MBOR discourse over time can also be identified. The direction changes from autonomy and a simple MBOR system in the early years toward more control and a more comprehensive system in the 1990s, and back again toward more autonomy and a less comprehensive MBOR system in recent years. The development processes in the three countries are characterized by some differences, but seem also to share numerous similarities. Explanations of these differences and similarities are discussed in the final section of the paper.",
author = "Kristiansen, {Mads B{\o}ge}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/15309576.2015.1006468",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "542--569",
journal = "Public Performance and Management Review",
issn = "1530-9576",
publisher = "Heinemann",
number = "3",

}

Management by Objectives and Results in the Nordic Countries : Continuity and Change, Differences and Similarities. / Kristiansen, Mads Bøge.

I: Public Performance and Management Review, Bind 38, Nr. 3, 8, 03.2015, s. 542-569.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management by Objectives and Results in the Nordic Countries

T2 - Continuity and Change, Differences and Similarities

AU - Kristiansen, Mads Bøge

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - In order to identify continuity or change, this paper analyzes the development processes of the management by objectives and results (MBOR) discourse over time in the central governments of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. It shows that MBOR has been marked by continuity since its introduction in the 1980s, and has become a central element in the steering and management of agencies in central government in all three countries. Nevertheless, gradual changes that have altered the direction of the MBOR discourse over time can also be identified. The direction changes from autonomy and a simple MBOR system in the early years toward more control and a more comprehensive system in the 1990s, and back again toward more autonomy and a less comprehensive MBOR system in recent years. The development processes in the three countries are characterized by some differences, but seem also to share numerous similarities. Explanations of these differences and similarities are discussed in the final section of the paper.

AB - In order to identify continuity or change, this paper analyzes the development processes of the management by objectives and results (MBOR) discourse over time in the central governments of Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. It shows that MBOR has been marked by continuity since its introduction in the 1980s, and has become a central element in the steering and management of agencies in central government in all three countries. Nevertheless, gradual changes that have altered the direction of the MBOR discourse over time can also be identified. The direction changes from autonomy and a simple MBOR system in the early years toward more control and a more comprehensive system in the 1990s, and back again toward more autonomy and a less comprehensive MBOR system in recent years. The development processes in the three countries are characterized by some differences, but seem also to share numerous similarities. Explanations of these differences and similarities are discussed in the final section of the paper.

U2 - 10.1080/15309576.2015.1006468

DO - 10.1080/15309576.2015.1006468

M3 - Journal article

VL - 38

SP - 542

EP - 569

JO - Public Performance and Management Review

JF - Public Performance and Management Review

SN - 1530-9576

IS - 3

M1 - 8

ER -