Low-risk isn't no-risk: Perinatal treatments and the health of low-income newborns

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstrakt

We investigate the effects of perinatal medical treatments on low-income newborns who are classified as low-risk. A policy rule in The Netherlands states that low-risk deliveries before week 37 should be supervised by physicians and later deliveries only by midwives with no physician present. This creates large discontinuities in the probability of receiving medical interventions only physicians are allowed to perform. Using a regression discontinuity design, we find that babies born slightly before the week-37 cutoff are significantly less likely to die than babies born slightly later. Our data suggest that physician supervision of birth reduces the likelihood of adverse events such as fetal distress or emergency C-section. Our results indicate that low-income women benefit from receiving a higher level of medical care even if no explicit risk factors have been recognized, pointing to challenges in identifying all high-risk pregnancies. "Back-of-the-envelope" calculations suggest this additional care is highly cost-effective.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Health Economics
Vol/bind64
Udgave nummerMarch
Sider (fra-til)55-67
ISSN0167-6296
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1. mar. 2019

Bibliografisk note

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Fingeraftryk Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Low-risk isn't no-risk: Perinatal treatments and the health of low-income newborns'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater