Kritisk læsning af systematiske oversigtsartikler

David Ruben Teindl Laursen*, Stig Brorson, Andreas Lundh, Ann Merete Møller, Camilla Hansen Nejstgaard, Jacob Rosenberg, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A systematic review provides an overview of primary studies investigating a given research question, e.g., the effect of a certain treatment. Individual study results are sometimes synthesised in a meta-analysis. A critical reader should consider whether the systematic review is relevant and reliable, e.g., does it follow a protocol, address the risk of bias, and consider potential heterogeneity. PRISMA 2020 guideline recommends a minimum set of items that should be reported in a systematic review article, and AMSTAR 2 and ROBIS are tools for critical appraisal of systematic reviews.

Bidragets oversatte titelCritical reading of systematic review articles
OriginalsprogDansk
ArtikelnummerV09230616
TidsskriftUgeskrift for Laeger
Vol/bind186
Udgave nummer12
ISSN0041-5782
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 10. jun. 2024

Bibliografisk note

Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Kritisk læsning af systematiske oversigtsartikler'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater