TY - JOUR
T1 - Keep circularity meaningful, inclusive and practical
T2 - A view into the plastics value chain
AU - Cimpan, Ciprian
AU - Iacovidou, Eleni
AU - Rigamonti, Lucia
AU - Thoden van Velzen, Eggo U.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/7/1
Y1 - 2023/7/1
N2 - New policies to promote the circular economy have created an urgent need for businesses and public authorities to quantify and monitor the level of circularity of materials, components and products. However, flows of materials, components and products through society are inherently complex, involving intricate value chains, many stakeholders, and interests. We argue that current actions may be overly focused on superficial effects, and losing sight of true circular economy goals. Using plastic packaging as an example, the present contribution deliberates the questions, “does measuring circularity address its goals?”, “does it cover new technologies and regional specificities?”, and “can its goals be addressed with simple assessment approaches?”. In answering these questions, we argue that there is an impending risk of cementing policy and infrastructures that may not contribute to true sustainability. Furthermore, future technologies and developing regions are hardly included in the current circularity strategies. To further spark a discussion on the challenge of simplicity, we present a scorecard which can help incumbents to approximate the level of sustainable circularity of their products.
AB - New policies to promote the circular economy have created an urgent need for businesses and public authorities to quantify and monitor the level of circularity of materials, components and products. However, flows of materials, components and products through society are inherently complex, involving intricate value chains, many stakeholders, and interests. We argue that current actions may be overly focused on superficial effects, and losing sight of true circular economy goals. Using plastic packaging as an example, the present contribution deliberates the questions, “does measuring circularity address its goals?”, “does it cover new technologies and regional specificities?”, and “can its goals be addressed with simple assessment approaches?”. In answering these questions, we argue that there is an impending risk of cementing policy and infrastructures that may not contribute to true sustainability. Furthermore, future technologies and developing regions are hardly included in the current circularity strategies. To further spark a discussion on the challenge of simplicity, we present a scorecard which can help incumbents to approximate the level of sustainable circularity of their products.
KW - Circular economy
KW - Critique
KW - Discussion
KW - Perspectives
KW - Plastic packaging
U2 - 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.049
DO - 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.049
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37167709
AN - SCOPUS:85158864404
SN - 0956-053X
VL - 166
SP - 115
EP - 121
JO - Waste Management
JF - Waste Management
ER -