(Ir)Regularity

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference-proceedingBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Resumé

This chapter explores the nature and communicative uses of irregular and distressed shapes in graphics. Its argument begins with a paradox.

Consider the three graphic structures depicted as Figure 9.1a and 9.1b. While all three-depending on the situation-express the concept of ‘circle’ or ‘round’, they look distinctly different. Figure 9.1a has a clean, regular outline whereas the outline of Figure 9.1b is distressed and irregular, showing many little dips, bumps and streaks. Figure 9.1c, on casual inspection, appears regular, but attention to detail reveals many little irregularities. We produced the three circles ourselves using Adobe’s vector-based Illustrator software for Figure 9.1a and a cheap, flat 1-inch paintbrush and watereddown black acrylic paint on plain white 100-gram photocopy paper for Figures 9.1b and 9.1c. Neither of the first two marks, Figures 9.1a and 9.1b, took particular effort to produce. Figure 9.1c, however, took considerable effort.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelThe Materiality of Writing : A Trace Making Perspective
RedaktørerChristian Mosbæk Johannessen, Theo van Leeuwen
Udgivelses stedNew York
ForlagRoutledge
Publikationsdato2018
Sider175-192
Kapitel9
ISBN (Trykt)9781138679726
ISBN (Elektronisk)9781315537306
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018
NavnRoutledge Studies in Multimodality
Vol/bind20

Fingeraftryk

Regularity
Regular
Irregular
Photocopy
Nature
Paradox
Paintbrush
Software
Acrylic Paint

Citer dette

Johannessen, C. M., & van Leeuwen, T. (2018). (Ir)Regularity. I C. M. Johannessen, & T. van Leeuwen (red.), The Materiality of Writing: A Trace Making Perspective (s. 175-192). New York: Routledge. Routledge Studies in Multimodality, Bind. 20 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315537306-10
Johannessen, Christian Mosbæk ; van Leeuwen, Theo. / (Ir)Regularity. The Materiality of Writing: A Trace Making Perspective. red. / Christian Mosbæk Johannessen ; Theo van Leeuwen. New York : Routledge, 2018. s. 175-192 (Routledge Studies in Multimodality, Bind 20).
@inbook{ec680ea0e8934f0fad89cbe47c93dd04,
title = "(Ir)Regularity",
abstract = "This chapter explores the nature and communicative uses of irregular and distressed shapes in graphics. Its argument begins with a paradox.Consider the three graphic structures depicted as Figure 9.1a and 9.1b. While all three-depending on the situation-express the concept of ‘circle’ or ‘round’, they look distinctly different. Figure 9.1a has a clean, regular outline whereas the outline of Figure 9.1b is distressed and irregular, showing many little dips, bumps and streaks. Figure 9.1c, on casual inspection, appears regular, but attention to detail reveals many little irregularities. We produced the three circles ourselves using Adobe’s vector-based Illustrator software for Figure 9.1a and a cheap, flat 1-inch paintbrush and watereddown black acrylic paint on plain white 100-gram photocopy paper for Figures 9.1b and 9.1c. Neither of the first two marks, Figures 9.1a and 9.1b, took particular effort to produce. Figure 9.1c, however, took considerable effort.",
author = "Johannessen, {Christian Mosb{\ae}k} and {van Leeuwen}, Theo",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.4324/9781315537306-10",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138679726",
pages = "175--192",
editor = "Johannessen, {Christian Mosb{\ae}k} and {van Leeuwen}, Theo",
booktitle = "The Materiality of Writing",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Johannessen, CM & van Leeuwen, T 2018, (Ir)Regularity. i CM Johannessen & T van Leeuwen (red), The Materiality of Writing: A Trace Making Perspective. Routledge, New York, Routledge Studies in Multimodality, bind 20, s. 175-192. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315537306-10

(Ir)Regularity. / Johannessen, Christian Mosbæk; van Leeuwen, Theo.

The Materiality of Writing: A Trace Making Perspective. red. / Christian Mosbæk Johannessen; Theo van Leeuwen. New York : Routledge, 2018. s. 175-192 (Routledge Studies in Multimodality, Bind 20).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/konference-proceedingBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - (Ir)Regularity

AU - Johannessen, Christian Mosbæk

AU - van Leeuwen, Theo

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This chapter explores the nature and communicative uses of irregular and distressed shapes in graphics. Its argument begins with a paradox.Consider the three graphic structures depicted as Figure 9.1a and 9.1b. While all three-depending on the situation-express the concept of ‘circle’ or ‘round’, they look distinctly different. Figure 9.1a has a clean, regular outline whereas the outline of Figure 9.1b is distressed and irregular, showing many little dips, bumps and streaks. Figure 9.1c, on casual inspection, appears regular, but attention to detail reveals many little irregularities. We produced the three circles ourselves using Adobe’s vector-based Illustrator software for Figure 9.1a and a cheap, flat 1-inch paintbrush and watereddown black acrylic paint on plain white 100-gram photocopy paper for Figures 9.1b and 9.1c. Neither of the first two marks, Figures 9.1a and 9.1b, took particular effort to produce. Figure 9.1c, however, took considerable effort.

AB - This chapter explores the nature and communicative uses of irregular and distressed shapes in graphics. Its argument begins with a paradox.Consider the three graphic structures depicted as Figure 9.1a and 9.1b. While all three-depending on the situation-express the concept of ‘circle’ or ‘round’, they look distinctly different. Figure 9.1a has a clean, regular outline whereas the outline of Figure 9.1b is distressed and irregular, showing many little dips, bumps and streaks. Figure 9.1c, on casual inspection, appears regular, but attention to detail reveals many little irregularities. We produced the three circles ourselves using Adobe’s vector-based Illustrator software for Figure 9.1a and a cheap, flat 1-inch paintbrush and watereddown black acrylic paint on plain white 100-gram photocopy paper for Figures 9.1b and 9.1c. Neither of the first two marks, Figures 9.1a and 9.1b, took particular effort to produce. Figure 9.1c, however, took considerable effort.

U2 - 10.4324/9781315537306-10

DO - 10.4324/9781315537306-10

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781138679726

SP - 175

EP - 192

BT - The Materiality of Writing

A2 - Johannessen, Christian Mosbæk

A2 - van Leeuwen, Theo

PB - Routledge

CY - New York

ER -

Johannessen CM, van Leeuwen T. (Ir)Regularity. I Johannessen CM, van Leeuwen T, red., The Materiality of Writing: A Trace Making Perspective. New York: Routledge. 2018. s. 175-192. (Routledge Studies in Multimodality, Bind 20). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315537306-10