Integrated care in a Beveridge system: experiences from England and Denmark

Apostolos Tsiachristas, Karsten Vrangbæk, Pamela Gongora-Salazar, Søren Rud Kristensen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Health systems internationally face demands to deliver care that is better coordinated and integrated. The health system financing and delivery model may go some, but not all the way in explaining health system fragmentation. In this paper, we consider the road to care integration in two countries with Beveridge style health systems, England and Denmark, that are both ranked as highly Integrated systems in Toth's health integration index. We use the SELFIE framework to compare the policies and reforms that have affected care integration over the past 30 years in the two countries. The countries both started their reform path by reforming to introduce choice and competition, but did so in different ways that set them on different pathways. Nevertheless, after two decades, the countries ended the period with largely similar structures that emphasised the creation of a cross-sectoral governance structure. In the relatively centralised England, by introducing decentralised Integrated Care Systems, and in the relatively decentralised Denmark with a centralising element in the form of new Health Clusters.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHealth Economics, Policy and Law
Vol/bind18
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)345-361
ISSN1744-1331
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 13. okt. 2023

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Integrated care in a Beveridge system: experiences from England and Denmark'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater