In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues

Justin Greenwood, Christilla Roederer-Rynning

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

58 Downloads (Pure)

Resumé

This article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a secluded setting to conclude legislative agreements. Trilogues have become the modus operandi and an absolutely pivotal part of the EU law-making process: they are where the deals are made. While secluded decision-making offers plenty of opportunities for EU institutions to depoliticize law-making, we argue that trilogues have become politicized, partly from the relationship between the EP and CSOs. We flesh out this argument on the basis of insights from the politicization and the historical institutionalist literatures, advance two ideal types of trilogue politics, and explore these types on the basis of a preliminary examination of a comprehensive interview material.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPolitics and Governance
Vol/bind7
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)316-326
ISSN2183-2463
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 27. sep. 2019

Fingeraftryk

European Parliament
politicization
public opinion
civil society
EU
ideal type
European Law
decision making
examination
Law
politics
interview

Citer dette

@article{b6cf0ea4eab84a9c96dd3a49ffa74c30,
title = "In the Shadow of Public Opinion: The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues",
abstract = "This article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a secluded setting to conclude legislative agreements. Trilogues have become the modus operandi and an absolutely pivotal part of the EU law-making process: they are where the deals are made. While secluded decision-making offers plenty of opportunities for EU institutions to depoliticize law-making, we argue that trilogues have become politicized, partly from the relationship between the EP and CSOs. We flesh out this argument on the basis of insights from the politicization and the historical institutionalist literatures, advance two ideal types of trilogue politics, and explore these types on the basis of a preliminary examination of a comprehensive interview material.",
keywords = "Civil society organisations, European parliament, Institutionalism, Law-making, Legislative process, Politicisation, Trilogues",
author = "Justin Greenwood and Christilla Roederer-Rynning",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "27",
doi = "10.17645/pag.v7i3.2175",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "316--326",
journal = "Politics and Governance",
issn = "2183-2463",
publisher = "Cogitatio Press",
number = "3",

}

In the Shadow of Public Opinion : The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues. / Greenwood, Justin; Roederer-Rynning, Christilla.

I: Politics and Governance, Bind 7, Nr. 3, 27.09.2019, s. 316-326.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - In the Shadow of Public Opinion

T2 - The European Parliament, Civil Society Organizations, and the Politicization of Trilogues

AU - Greenwood, Justin

AU - Roederer-Rynning, Christilla

PY - 2019/9/27

Y1 - 2019/9/27

N2 - This article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a secluded setting to conclude legislative agreements. Trilogues have become the modus operandi and an absolutely pivotal part of the EU law-making process: they are where the deals are made. While secluded decision-making offers plenty of opportunities for EU institutions to depoliticize law-making, we argue that trilogues have become politicized, partly from the relationship between the EP and CSOs. We flesh out this argument on the basis of insights from the politicization and the historical institutionalist literatures, advance two ideal types of trilogue politics, and explore these types on the basis of a preliminary examination of a comprehensive interview material.

AB - This article examines the relations between the European Parliament (EP) and civil society organizations (CSOs) in the EU’s legislative process. It focuses specifically on legislative trilogues, an informal institution bringing together the representatives of the EP, Council, and Commission in a secluded setting to conclude legislative agreements. Trilogues have become the modus operandi and an absolutely pivotal part of the EU law-making process: they are where the deals are made. While secluded decision-making offers plenty of opportunities for EU institutions to depoliticize law-making, we argue that trilogues have become politicized, partly from the relationship between the EP and CSOs. We flesh out this argument on the basis of insights from the politicization and the historical institutionalist literatures, advance two ideal types of trilogue politics, and explore these types on the basis of a preliminary examination of a comprehensive interview material.

KW - Civil society organisations

KW - European parliament

KW - Institutionalism

KW - Law-making

KW - Legislative process

KW - Politicisation

KW - Trilogues

U2 - 10.17645/pag.v7i3.2175

DO - 10.17645/pag.v7i3.2175

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 316

EP - 326

JO - Politics and Governance

JF - Politics and Governance

SN - 2183-2463

IS - 3

ER -