TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of GTV-CTV margin and other predictors on radiation-induced dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients from DAHANCA group
AU - Stougaard, Sarah Wordenskjold
AU - Zukauskaite, Ruta
AU - Röttger, Richard
AU - Lorenzen, Ebbe Laugaard
AU - Konrad, Maximilian Lukas
AU - Krogh, Simon Long
AU - Nielsen, Camilla Panduro
AU - Sommer, Jeanette Frieda Aviaya
AU - Johansen, Jørgen
AU - Eriksen, Jesper Grau
AU - Lonkvist, Camilla Kjaer
AU - Friborg, Jeppe
AU - Brink, Carsten
AU - Hansen, Christian Rønn
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background and purpose: This multicentre, retrospective study aimed to develop a predictive model for radiation-induced dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients, focusing on the role of gross tumour volume (GTV) to high dose CTV (CTV1) margin size and dose-related factors. Unlike previous studies focused on peak or single time-point dysphagia, this study modelled symptom trajectories using repeated follow-up data for a more complete picture. Patient/material and methods: Between 2010 and 2015, 1,948 patients with pharyngeal or laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma received definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at three Danish centres. Data included physician-rated dysphagia (grade 0–4), tumour and treatment characteristics, and AI-based segmentations of organs at risk (OARs). Predictors included GTV-CTV1 margin size, mean doses to the oral cavity and pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCM), GTV volume, chemotherapy, tumour site, fractionation, nimorazole, sex, smoking status, baseline dysphagia, and age. A logistic ordinal mixed-effects model was fitted with patient ID as random effect. Data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Model performance was assessed using calibration plots and area under the curve (AUC). Results: After excluding incomplete cases, 1,685 patients (7,829 visits) were analysed. GTV-CTV1 margin size was not significantly associated with dysphagia, although larger margins correlated with higher OAR doses. Higher doses to the lower PCM (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30 per 5 Gy) and oral cavity (OR = 1.32 per 5 Gy) increased risk. The model demonstrated good calibration and robust discrimination (AUC = 0.77–0.84). Interpretation: Radiation dose to the oral cavity and lower PCM were the strongest modifiable predictors of dysphagia risk. Margin size was not independently associated, possibly due to confounding by clinical judgement.
AB - Background and purpose: This multicentre, retrospective study aimed to develop a predictive model for radiation-induced dysphagia in head and neck cancer patients, focusing on the role of gross tumour volume (GTV) to high dose CTV (CTV1) margin size and dose-related factors. Unlike previous studies focused on peak or single time-point dysphagia, this study modelled symptom trajectories using repeated follow-up data for a more complete picture. Patient/material and methods: Between 2010 and 2015, 1,948 patients with pharyngeal or laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma received definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at three Danish centres. Data included physician-rated dysphagia (grade 0–4), tumour and treatment characteristics, and AI-based segmentations of organs at risk (OARs). Predictors included GTV-CTV1 margin size, mean doses to the oral cavity and pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCM), GTV volume, chemotherapy, tumour site, fractionation, nimorazole, sex, smoking status, baseline dysphagia, and age. A logistic ordinal mixed-effects model was fitted with patient ID as random effect. Data were split into training (70%) and test (30%) sets. Model performance was assessed using calibration plots and area under the curve (AUC). Results: After excluding incomplete cases, 1,685 patients (7,829 visits) were analysed. GTV-CTV1 margin size was not significantly associated with dysphagia, although larger margins correlated with higher OAR doses. Higher doses to the lower PCM (odds ratio [OR] = 1.30 per 5 Gy) and oral cavity (OR = 1.32 per 5 Gy) increased risk. The model demonstrated good calibration and robust discrimination (AUC = 0.77–0.84). Interpretation: Radiation dose to the oral cavity and lower PCM were the strongest modifiable predictors of dysphagia risk. Margin size was not independently associated, possibly due to confounding by clinical judgement.
KW - guidelines
KW - head and neck cancer
KW - modelling
KW - Radiotherapy
KW - side effects
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105016667739
U2 - 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44021
DO - 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.44021
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 40965329
AN - SCOPUS:105016667739
SN - 0284-186X
VL - 64
SP - 1253
EP - 1261
JO - Acta Oncologica
JF - Acta Oncologica
ER -