TY - JOUR
T1 - Immersive Virtual Reality in Basic Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Andersen, Nanna L.
AU - Jensen, Rune O.
AU - Konge, Lars
AU - Laursen, Christian B.
AU - Falster, Casper
AU - Jacobsen, Niels
AU - Elhakim, Mohammad T.
AU - Bojsen, Jonas A.
AU - Riishede, Minna
AU - Fransen, Maja L.
AU - Rasmussen, Benjamin S.B.
AU - Posth, Stefan
AU - Sant, Linus
AU - Graumann, Ole
N1 - Funding Information:
R.O.J. is CEO and co-founder of VitaSim, which provided the virtual reality software used in this study. R.O.J. did not assess any of the participants’ ultrasound skills nor teach the ultrasound course. The remaining authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - This study was aimed at comparing the learning efficacy of a traditional instructor-led lesson with that of a completely virtual, self-directed lesson in immersive virtual reality (IVR) in teaching basic point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) skills. We conducted a blinded, non-inferiority, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in which final-year medical students were randomized to an instructor-led (n = 53) or IVR (n = 51) lesson. Participants' learning efficacy was evaluated by blinded assessors, who rated each participant's performance using the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) assessment tool.The mean total scores for participants were 11.0 points (95% confidence interval: 9.8-12.2) for the instructor-led lesson and 10.3 points (95% confidence interval: 9.0-11.5) for the IVR lesson. No significant differences were observed between the groups with respect to total score (p = 0.36) or subgroup objectives of the OSAUS score (p = 0.34 for familiarity, p = 0.45 for image optimization, p = 0.96 for systematic approach and p = 0.07 for interpretation). Maintenance costs for both courses were estimated at 400 euros each. Startup costs for the instructor-led course were estimated 16 times higher than those for the IVR course. The learning efficacy of an instructor-led lesson on basic US did not differ significantly from that of a self-directed lesson in IVR, as assessed using the OSAUS. The results suggest that IVR could be an equivalent alternative to instructor-led lessons in future basic ultrasonography courses, but further research is warranted to clarify the role of IVR in PoCUS courses.
AB - This study was aimed at comparing the learning efficacy of a traditional instructor-led lesson with that of a completely virtual, self-directed lesson in immersive virtual reality (IVR) in teaching basic point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) skills. We conducted a blinded, non-inferiority, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial in which final-year medical students were randomized to an instructor-led (n = 53) or IVR (n = 51) lesson. Participants' learning efficacy was evaluated by blinded assessors, who rated each participant's performance using the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) assessment tool.The mean total scores for participants were 11.0 points (95% confidence interval: 9.8-12.2) for the instructor-led lesson and 10.3 points (95% confidence interval: 9.0-11.5) for the IVR lesson. No significant differences were observed between the groups with respect to total score (p = 0.36) or subgroup objectives of the OSAUS score (p = 0.34 for familiarity, p = 0.45 for image optimization, p = 0.96 for systematic approach and p = 0.07 for interpretation). Maintenance costs for both courses were estimated at 400 euros each. Startup costs for the instructor-led course were estimated 16 times higher than those for the IVR course. The learning efficacy of an instructor-led lesson on basic US did not differ significantly from that of a self-directed lesson in IVR, as assessed using the OSAUS. The results suggest that IVR could be an equivalent alternative to instructor-led lessons in future basic ultrasonography courses, but further research is warranted to clarify the role of IVR in PoCUS courses.
KW - Immersive virtual reality
KW - Medical students
KW - Ultrasound education
KW - Clinical Competence
KW - Point-of-Care Systems
KW - Humans
KW - Students, Medical
KW - Virtual Reality
KW - Ultrasonography
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.08.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.08.012
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36216656
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 49
SP - 178
EP - 185
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
IS - 1
ER -