Identification of decisive factors for greenhouse gas emissions in comparative life cycle assessments of food waste management – an analytical review

Anna Bernstad, Henrik Wenzel, Jes la Cour Jansen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Resumé

A review of existing life cycle assessments on food waste management was made with two main aims. Firstly, to make an overview of the assessments of the global warming potential from the treatment alternatives incineration, landfill, anaerobic digestion and compost in studies reported in literature. Secondly, to identify decisive factors in general and related to system boundary settings in particular, in reviewed studies. A number of criteria were constructed for identification of relevant comparative life cycle assessments, resulting in selection of nineteen studies, containing 103 different scenarios. The
systematic investigation of the studies show examples of several methodological differences as well as choices in systems boundary setting causing misleading comparisons between different treatment options, but also large variations in used input data for modeling of similar processes. The review also shows that the most significant differences in global warming results in many cases can be explained by assumptions made in relation to the background system, rather than by differences in data on emissions surging from to the foreground system. Especially assumptions on the interaction of the waste management system with the background energy system and/or bio-system were found to be decisive to the results. This highlights the importance of identification of induced and displaced marginal products in the modeling of system expansion, as well as need for increased transparency and use of sensitivity analyses related to assumptions made in background system modeling, in order to reveal under which set of assumptions results gained in the assessment are valid.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Cleaner Production
Vol/bind119
Sider (fra-til)13-24
ISSN0959-6526
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016

Emneord

  • waste management
  • bio-waste
  • LCA

Citer dette

@article{2b2822cefe35416ba5b54b7d9b096687,
title = "Identification of decisive factors for greenhouse gas emissions in comparative life cycle assessments of food waste management – an analytical review",
abstract = "A review of existing life cycle assessments on food waste management was made with two main aims. Firstly, to make an overview of the assessments of the global warming potential from the treatment alternatives incineration, landfill, anaerobic digestion and compost in studies reported in literature. Secondly, to identify decisive factors in general and related to system boundary settings in particular, in reviewed studies. A number of criteria were constructed for identification of relevant comparative life cycle assessments, resulting in selection of nineteen studies, containing 103 different scenarios. Thesystematic investigation of the studies show examples of several methodological differences as well as choices in systems boundary setting causing misleading comparisons between different treatment options, but also large variations in used input data for modeling of similar processes. The review also shows that the most significant differences in global warming results in many cases can be explained by assumptions made in relation to the background system, rather than by differences in data on emissions surging from to the foreground system. Especially assumptions on the interaction of the waste management system with the background energy system and/or bio-system were found to be decisive to the results. This highlights the importance of identification of induced and displaced marginal products in the modeling of system expansion, as well as need for increased transparency and use of sensitivity analyses related to assumptions made in background system modeling, in order to reveal under which set of assumptions results gained in the assessment are valid.",
keywords = "waste management, bio-waste, LCA",
author = "Anna Bernstad and Henrik Wenzel and Jansen, {Jes la Cour}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.079",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "13--24",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Identification of decisive factors for greenhouse gas emissions in comparative life cycle assessments of food waste management – an analytical review. / Bernstad, Anna; Wenzel, Henrik; Jansen, Jes la Cour.

I: Journal of Cleaner Production, Bind 119, 2016, s. 13-24.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of decisive factors for greenhouse gas emissions in comparative life cycle assessments of food waste management – an analytical review

AU - Bernstad, Anna

AU - Wenzel, Henrik

AU - Jansen, Jes la Cour

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - A review of existing life cycle assessments on food waste management was made with two main aims. Firstly, to make an overview of the assessments of the global warming potential from the treatment alternatives incineration, landfill, anaerobic digestion and compost in studies reported in literature. Secondly, to identify decisive factors in general and related to system boundary settings in particular, in reviewed studies. A number of criteria were constructed for identification of relevant comparative life cycle assessments, resulting in selection of nineteen studies, containing 103 different scenarios. Thesystematic investigation of the studies show examples of several methodological differences as well as choices in systems boundary setting causing misleading comparisons between different treatment options, but also large variations in used input data for modeling of similar processes. The review also shows that the most significant differences in global warming results in many cases can be explained by assumptions made in relation to the background system, rather than by differences in data on emissions surging from to the foreground system. Especially assumptions on the interaction of the waste management system with the background energy system and/or bio-system were found to be decisive to the results. This highlights the importance of identification of induced and displaced marginal products in the modeling of system expansion, as well as need for increased transparency and use of sensitivity analyses related to assumptions made in background system modeling, in order to reveal under which set of assumptions results gained in the assessment are valid.

AB - A review of existing life cycle assessments on food waste management was made with two main aims. Firstly, to make an overview of the assessments of the global warming potential from the treatment alternatives incineration, landfill, anaerobic digestion and compost in studies reported in literature. Secondly, to identify decisive factors in general and related to system boundary settings in particular, in reviewed studies. A number of criteria were constructed for identification of relevant comparative life cycle assessments, resulting in selection of nineteen studies, containing 103 different scenarios. Thesystematic investigation of the studies show examples of several methodological differences as well as choices in systems boundary setting causing misleading comparisons between different treatment options, but also large variations in used input data for modeling of similar processes. The review also shows that the most significant differences in global warming results in many cases can be explained by assumptions made in relation to the background system, rather than by differences in data on emissions surging from to the foreground system. Especially assumptions on the interaction of the waste management system with the background energy system and/or bio-system were found to be decisive to the results. This highlights the importance of identification of induced and displaced marginal products in the modeling of system expansion, as well as need for increased transparency and use of sensitivity analyses related to assumptions made in background system modeling, in order to reveal under which set of assumptions results gained in the assessment are valid.

KW - waste management

KW - bio-waste

KW - LCA

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.079

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.079

M3 - Review

VL - 119

SP - 13

EP - 24

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -