ICRS Recommendation Document: Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects

Ewa M. Roos, Luella Engelhart, Jonas Ranstam, Allen F. Anderson, Jay J. Irrgang, Robert G. Marx, Yelverton Tegner, Aileen M. Davis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

Resumé

Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe and recommend patient-reported outcome instruments for use in patients with articular cartilage lesions undergoing cartilage repair interventions. Methods: Nonsystematic literature search identifying measures addressing pain and function evaluated for validity and psychometric properties in patients with articular cartilage lesions. Results: The knee-specific instruments, titled the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score, both fulfill the basic requirements for reliability, validity, and responsiveness in cartilage repair patients. A major difference between them is that the former results in a single score and the latter results in 5 subscores. A single score is preferred for simplicity’s sake, whereas subscores allow for evaluation of separate constructs at all levels according to the International Classification of Functioning. Conclusions: Because there is no obvious superiority of either instrument at this time, both outcome measures are recommended for use in cartilage repair. Rescaling of the Lysholm Scoring Scale has been suggested, and confirmatory longitudinal studies are needed prior to recommending this scale for use in cartilage repair. Inclusion of a generic measure is feasible in cartilage repair studies and allows analysis of health-related quality of life and health economic outcomes. The Marx or Tegner Activity Rating Scales are feasible and have been evaluated in patients with knee injuries. However, activity measures require age and sex adjustment, and data are lacking in people with cartilage repair.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCartilage
Vol/bind2
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)122-136
Antal sider15
ISSN1947-6035
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2011

Bibliografisk note

Published online before print January 25, 2011

Citer dette

Roos, E. M., Engelhart, L., Ranstam, J., Anderson, A. F., Irrgang, J. J., Marx, R. G., ... Davis, A. M. (2011). ICRS Recommendation Document: Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects. Cartilage, 2 (2), 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603510391084
Roos, Ewa M. ; Engelhart, Luella ; Ranstam, Jonas ; Anderson, Allen F. ; Irrgang, Jay J. ; Marx, Robert G. ; Tegner, Yelverton ; Davis, Aileen M. / ICRS Recommendation Document : Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects. I: Cartilage. 2011 ; Bind 2 , Nr. 2. s. 122-136.
@article{858f7c283cae47f887e93d9f2681ca2f,
title = "ICRS Recommendation Document: Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects",
abstract = "Abstract Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe and recommend patient-reported outcome instruments for use in patients with articular cartilage lesions undergoing cartilage repair interventions. Methods: Nonsystematic literature search identifying measures addressing pain and function evaluated for validity and psychometric properties in patients with articular cartilage lesions. Results: The knee-specific instruments, titled the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score, both fulfill the basic requirements for reliability, validity, and responsiveness in cartilage repair patients. A major difference between them is that the former results in a single score and the latter results in 5 subscores. A single score is preferred for simplicity’s sake, whereas subscores allow for evaluation of separate constructs at all levels according to the International Classification of Functioning. Conclusions: Because there is no obvious superiority of either instrument at this time, both outcome measures are recommended for use in cartilage repair. Rescaling of the Lysholm Scoring Scale has been suggested, and confirmatory longitudinal studies are needed prior to recommending this scale for use in cartilage repair. Inclusion of a generic measure is feasible in cartilage repair studies and allows analysis of health-related quality of life and health economic outcomes. The Marx or Tegner Activity Rating Scales are feasible and have been evaluated in patients with knee injuries. However, activity measures require age and sex adjustment, and data are lacking in people with cartilage repair.",
author = "Roos, {Ewa M.} and Luella Engelhart and Jonas Ranstam and Anderson, {Allen F.} and Irrgang, {Jay J.} and Marx, {Robert G.} and Yelverton Tegner and Davis, {Aileen M.}",
note = "Published online before print January 25, 2011",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/1947603510391084",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "122--136",
journal = "Cartilage",
issn = "1947-6035",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

Roos, EM, Engelhart, L, Ranstam, J, Anderson, AF, Irrgang, JJ, Marx, RG, Tegner, Y & Davis, AM 2011, 'ICRS Recommendation Document: Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects', Cartilage, bind 2 , nr. 2, s. 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603510391084

ICRS Recommendation Document : Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects. / Roos, Ewa M.; Engelhart, Luella ; Ranstam, Jonas; Anderson, Allen F.; Irrgang, Jay J. ; Marx, Robert G.; Tegner, Yelverton; Davis, Aileen M.

I: Cartilage, Bind 2 , Nr. 2, 04.2011, s. 122-136.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - ICRS Recommendation Document

T2 - Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients with Articular Cartilage Defects

AU - Roos, Ewa M.

AU - Engelhart, Luella

AU - Ranstam, Jonas

AU - Anderson, Allen F.

AU - Irrgang, Jay J.

AU - Marx, Robert G.

AU - Tegner, Yelverton

AU - Davis, Aileen M.

N1 - Published online before print January 25, 2011

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Abstract Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe and recommend patient-reported outcome instruments for use in patients with articular cartilage lesions undergoing cartilage repair interventions. Methods: Nonsystematic literature search identifying measures addressing pain and function evaluated for validity and psychometric properties in patients with articular cartilage lesions. Results: The knee-specific instruments, titled the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score, both fulfill the basic requirements for reliability, validity, and responsiveness in cartilage repair patients. A major difference between them is that the former results in a single score and the latter results in 5 subscores. A single score is preferred for simplicity’s sake, whereas subscores allow for evaluation of separate constructs at all levels according to the International Classification of Functioning. Conclusions: Because there is no obvious superiority of either instrument at this time, both outcome measures are recommended for use in cartilage repair. Rescaling of the Lysholm Scoring Scale has been suggested, and confirmatory longitudinal studies are needed prior to recommending this scale for use in cartilage repair. Inclusion of a generic measure is feasible in cartilage repair studies and allows analysis of health-related quality of life and health economic outcomes. The Marx or Tegner Activity Rating Scales are feasible and have been evaluated in patients with knee injuries. However, activity measures require age and sex adjustment, and data are lacking in people with cartilage repair.

AB - Abstract Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe and recommend patient-reported outcome instruments for use in patients with articular cartilage lesions undergoing cartilage repair interventions. Methods: Nonsystematic literature search identifying measures addressing pain and function evaluated for validity and psychometric properties in patients with articular cartilage lesions. Results: The knee-specific instruments, titled the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score, both fulfill the basic requirements for reliability, validity, and responsiveness in cartilage repair patients. A major difference between them is that the former results in a single score and the latter results in 5 subscores. A single score is preferred for simplicity’s sake, whereas subscores allow for evaluation of separate constructs at all levels according to the International Classification of Functioning. Conclusions: Because there is no obvious superiority of either instrument at this time, both outcome measures are recommended for use in cartilage repair. Rescaling of the Lysholm Scoring Scale has been suggested, and confirmatory longitudinal studies are needed prior to recommending this scale for use in cartilage repair. Inclusion of a generic measure is feasible in cartilage repair studies and allows analysis of health-related quality of life and health economic outcomes. The Marx or Tegner Activity Rating Scales are feasible and have been evaluated in patients with knee injuries. However, activity measures require age and sex adjustment, and data are lacking in people with cartilage repair.

U2 - 10.1177/1947603510391084

DO - 10.1177/1947603510391084

M3 - Review

VL - 2

SP - 122

EP - 136

JO - Cartilage

JF - Cartilage

SN - 1947-6035

IS - 2

ER -