How to manage creativity time?

results from a social psychological time model lab experiment on individual creative and routine performance

Alexander Brem*, Verena Utikal

*Kontaktforfatter for dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Companies have long used various approaches for organizing their employees' time for creative and routine tasks in order to improve innovative performance. In this paper, we examine how work schedule autonomy affects individuals' creative and routine performance. We then evaluate non-commissioned time models. Results of laboratory experiments with 233 participants reveal that while average routine performance is not affected by schedule autonomy, the effect of schedule autonomy on creative performance depends on the subject's impulsiveness. There is evidence of an inverse relationship between schedule autonomy and creative performance among subjects of low impulsiveness. Hence, our results indicate that the optimal management policy depends on the manager's focus on creative or routine performance and the types of employees the manager supervises. For routine performance, the creativity time model has no significant impact.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCreativity and Innovation Management
Vol/bind28
Udgave nummer3
Sider (fra-til)291-305
ISSN0963-1690
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2019

Fingeraftryk

Managers
Personnel
Experiments
Industry
Creativity
Lab experiment
Psychological
Autonomy
Schedule
Employees
Creative performance

Citer dette

@article{9222eec352024988be1199843eda5251,
title = "How to manage creativity time?: results from a social psychological time model lab experiment on individual creative and routine performance",
abstract = "Companies have long used various approaches for organizing their employees' time for creative and routine tasks in order to improve innovative performance. In this paper, we examine how work schedule autonomy affects individuals' creative and routine performance. We then evaluate non-commissioned time models. Results of laboratory experiments with 233 participants reveal that while average routine performance is not affected by schedule autonomy, the effect of schedule autonomy on creative performance depends on the subject's impulsiveness. There is evidence of an inverse relationship between schedule autonomy and creative performance among subjects of low impulsiveness. Hence, our results indicate that the optimal management policy depends on the manager's focus on creative or routine performance and the types of employees the manager supervises. For routine performance, the creativity time model has no significant impact.",
author = "Alexander Brem and Verena Utikal",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/caim.12309",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "291--305",
journal = "Creativity and Innovation Management",
issn = "0963-1690",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

How to manage creativity time? results from a social psychological time model lab experiment on individual creative and routine performance. / Brem, Alexander; Utikal, Verena.

I: Creativity and Innovation Management, Bind 28, Nr. 3, 09.2019, s. 291-305.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to manage creativity time?

T2 - results from a social psychological time model lab experiment on individual creative and routine performance

AU - Brem, Alexander

AU - Utikal, Verena

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - Companies have long used various approaches for organizing their employees' time for creative and routine tasks in order to improve innovative performance. In this paper, we examine how work schedule autonomy affects individuals' creative and routine performance. We then evaluate non-commissioned time models. Results of laboratory experiments with 233 participants reveal that while average routine performance is not affected by schedule autonomy, the effect of schedule autonomy on creative performance depends on the subject's impulsiveness. There is evidence of an inverse relationship between schedule autonomy and creative performance among subjects of low impulsiveness. Hence, our results indicate that the optimal management policy depends on the manager's focus on creative or routine performance and the types of employees the manager supervises. For routine performance, the creativity time model has no significant impact.

AB - Companies have long used various approaches for organizing their employees' time for creative and routine tasks in order to improve innovative performance. In this paper, we examine how work schedule autonomy affects individuals' creative and routine performance. We then evaluate non-commissioned time models. Results of laboratory experiments with 233 participants reveal that while average routine performance is not affected by schedule autonomy, the effect of schedule autonomy on creative performance depends on the subject's impulsiveness. There is evidence of an inverse relationship between schedule autonomy and creative performance among subjects of low impulsiveness. Hence, our results indicate that the optimal management policy depends on the manager's focus on creative or routine performance and the types of employees the manager supervises. For routine performance, the creativity time model has no significant impact.

U2 - 10.1111/caim.12309

DO - 10.1111/caim.12309

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 291

EP - 305

JO - Creativity and Innovation Management

JF - Creativity and Innovation Management

SN - 0963-1690

IS - 3

ER -