Higher education journals as didactic frameworks

Tina Keiding, Ane Qvortrup

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

During the last 20 years, we have witnessed a growing interest in research in teaching, learning and educational development in higher education (HE). The result is that ‘Higher Education Didactics’ has established itself as a research field in its own right. This article explores Higher Education Didactics as a framework for academics’ professional reflection on teaching and learning, by mapping the didactic topics in all contributions in four journals in the period 2008–2015. Two of the journals are based in Scandinavia, where the European tradition of didactics (Didaktik) has been highly influential, while the others stem from the Anglo-Saxon curriculum tradition. The mapping shows that all journals are strongly occupied with teaching methods, especially methods grounded in theories of active and social learning. In contrast, didactic categories such as goal, content and assessment are rare topics. Students as participants and learners are a frequent topic in especially one journal, but receive little attention in the other journals. Also, educational technologies receive a varying degree of attention across the journals. Based on the mapping, this article discusses Higher Education Didactics as a framework for professional reflection in HE. It concludes that a broader range of research topics would be desirable and asks for future collaboration on the currently uncharted topics.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftHigher Education Research and Development
Vol/bind37
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)72-87
ISSN0729-4360
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018

Fingeraftryk

didactics
education
Scandinavia
social learning
Teaching
educational technology
teaching method
field research
learning
curriculum
student

Citer dette

@article{83689b5cebd946efab8ec686e7a67672,
title = "Higher education journals as didactic frameworks",
abstract = "During the last 20 years, we have witnessed a growing interest in research in teaching, learning and educational development in higher education (HE). The result is that ‘Higher Education Didactics’ has established itself as a research field in its own right. This article explores Higher Education Didactics as a framework for academics’ professional reflection on teaching and learning, by mapping the didactic topics in all contributions in four journals in the period 2008–2015. Two of the journals are based in Scandinavia, where the European tradition of didactics (Didaktik) has been highly influential, while the others stem from the Anglo-Saxon curriculum tradition. The mapping shows that all journals are strongly occupied with teaching methods, especially methods grounded in theories of active and social learning. In contrast, didactic categories such as goal, content and assessment are rare topics. Students as participants and learners are a frequent topic in especially one journal, but receive little attention in the other journals. Also, educational technologies receive a varying degree of attention across the journals. Based on the mapping, this article discusses Higher Education Didactics as a framework for professional reflection in HE. It concludes that a broader range of research topics would be desirable and asks for future collaboration on the currently uncharted topics.",
keywords = "Academic professionalism, didactics, higher education, scholarship of teaching and learning",
author = "Tina Keiding and Ane Qvortrup",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/07294360.2017.1342606",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "72--87",
journal = "Higher Education Research and Development",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "Heinemann",
number = "1",

}

Higher education journals as didactic frameworks. / Keiding, Tina; Qvortrup, Ane.

I: Higher Education Research and Development, Bind 37, Nr. 1, 2018, s. 72-87.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Higher education journals as didactic frameworks

AU - Keiding, Tina

AU - Qvortrup, Ane

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - During the last 20 years, we have witnessed a growing interest in research in teaching, learning and educational development in higher education (HE). The result is that ‘Higher Education Didactics’ has established itself as a research field in its own right. This article explores Higher Education Didactics as a framework for academics’ professional reflection on teaching and learning, by mapping the didactic topics in all contributions in four journals in the period 2008–2015. Two of the journals are based in Scandinavia, where the European tradition of didactics (Didaktik) has been highly influential, while the others stem from the Anglo-Saxon curriculum tradition. The mapping shows that all journals are strongly occupied with teaching methods, especially methods grounded in theories of active and social learning. In contrast, didactic categories such as goal, content and assessment are rare topics. Students as participants and learners are a frequent topic in especially one journal, but receive little attention in the other journals. Also, educational technologies receive a varying degree of attention across the journals. Based on the mapping, this article discusses Higher Education Didactics as a framework for professional reflection in HE. It concludes that a broader range of research topics would be desirable and asks for future collaboration on the currently uncharted topics.

AB - During the last 20 years, we have witnessed a growing interest in research in teaching, learning and educational development in higher education (HE). The result is that ‘Higher Education Didactics’ has established itself as a research field in its own right. This article explores Higher Education Didactics as a framework for academics’ professional reflection on teaching and learning, by mapping the didactic topics in all contributions in four journals in the period 2008–2015. Two of the journals are based in Scandinavia, where the European tradition of didactics (Didaktik) has been highly influential, while the others stem from the Anglo-Saxon curriculum tradition. The mapping shows that all journals are strongly occupied with teaching methods, especially methods grounded in theories of active and social learning. In contrast, didactic categories such as goal, content and assessment are rare topics. Students as participants and learners are a frequent topic in especially one journal, but receive little attention in the other journals. Also, educational technologies receive a varying degree of attention across the journals. Based on the mapping, this article discusses Higher Education Didactics as a framework for professional reflection in HE. It concludes that a broader range of research topics would be desirable and asks for future collaboration on the currently uncharted topics.

KW - Academic professionalism

KW - didactics

KW - higher education

KW - scholarship of teaching and learning

U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2017.1342606

DO - 10.1080/07294360.2017.1342606

M3 - Journal article

VL - 37

SP - 72

EP - 87

JO - Higher Education Research and Development

JF - Higher Education Research and Development

SN - 0729-4360

IS - 1

ER -